Friday, August 26, 2022

Deck Review: Arcanum Tarot

Renata Lechner, Arcanum Tarot. Woodbury, MN: Llewellyn, 2018. ISBN: 9780738758756. (link to publisher.)
 
The Hermit-IX card
I first used this deck in 2021 if memory serves me right, but for some reason I was not able to review it then. So I picked it up again during April 2022. 

This deck comes in a small solid box with the 78 card deck and a small paperback booklet. It's a Lo Scarabeo deck, so the booklet is written in five languages: English, Italian, Spanish, French, and Russian. The English text is about 60 pages. The text includes: 

  • An introduction defining the word "arcanum," "what is Tarot?" and how the booklet is organized. 
  • Major Arcana. Each card gets a quote and a short interpretation. You also get keywords for upright and reversed meanings. 
  • Minor Arcana. Same short and concise content as Major Arcana.
  • Arcanum Tarot Spread.  A four cards spread for this deck, but you can probably use it with other decks. 

 

Two of Swords card
Jaymi Elford wrote the booklet. The text is basic and straightforward. Similar to the Thelema Tarot deck's booklet (link to my review of that deck), the card interpretations are mostly descriptions of the card imagery with a bit on the symbols. The book overall is fairly basic, and it gives you enough to get started. As I suggested for the Thelema Tarot, I'd add a good Tarot reference book to keep handy, especially for beginners. I'd say the booklet does the job, but you may want more. 

The cards on this deck are great, and the art by Renata Lechner is excellent. Colors are bright yet soft. Cards have a bit of an ethereal quality. The art is computer generated, but is it very realistic. These are cards you can spend time looking at them. The art is well within Rider Waite Smith (RWS), so if you read cards in that style then you are good to go. The colors and rich images can be a good option for intuitive readers as well. 

The deck is very similar to the Thelema Tarot, but rest assured the cards are different. Note that this deck has a border and back in brown, which can make this deck feel very earthy. The Thelema Tarot's color scheme is in green. They are not radically different. I personally like and appreciate having both decks, but some card readers may be happy with one or the other. It may be a matter of personal preference. I do like both and being able to alternate use between them. 

The cards in the Arcanum Tarot measure about 4 1/2 inches by 2 1/2 inches. The cards have a light glossy finish. Card stock feels flexible. The card back on this deck is reversible. Overall, the deck works well as an RWS clone. The cards are borderless except for the bottom border with the card label. 

In the end, I really like this deck, and I am glad to have it in my collection. I like it because it is accessible, very easy to read, and has beautiful art. It is a deck I can use for myself and to read for others. For folks who have the Thelema Tarot, if you liked that deck you'll very likely enjoy this one too. 

4 out of 5 stars.

Monday, August 22, 2022

Some thoughts after using CounterSocial (CoSo) for 5 months or so

This is basically a somewhat rough review of the site emphasizing more my thoughts and impressions of the site. I joined the site in April 2022, and I paused using it this month, August 2022. 

When Elon Musk announced this year he was buying Twitter (a deal he is by now trying to get out of doing as employees of Twitter start to flee given the chaos), many Twitter users headed out the door, or at least threatened to do so. I decided at that time to look into alternatives just in case, To be honest, at the time I was not too serious about fully jumping ship. I was looking at options just in case. Also, as an academic librarian I have some interest in social media, so I am always open to trying new options and sites, or at least new to me. While I do strive to keep up, I am by no means an early adopter or such. I go at my own calm pace. 

I am not going to review the features of the site as that has been done elsewhere and probably better than I could. If you would like a summary of the site's features and some reviews with screenshots, etc., here are some reviews I found: 
 
  • "Who Owns Counter Social?" by Mohit Oberoi at Market Realist. Review looks at the site and its owner, the pseudonymous hacktivist The Jester. 
  • "The Notorious Hacker Who Is Trying To Fix Social Media" by Lucas Ropek at Gizmodo. This is a fairly sympathetic to The Jester article with review of the site. 
  • The Jester has his own Wikipedia entry. As reviews point out, the hacker does sound and/or come across as quite conservative, which can be ironic given CoSo has become a sort of very liberal haven, or at least seems to cater to that crowd. He describes himself as a "patriot," which these days is one of the code words for a conservative of some kind. He claims not to support Donald Trump, but that does not mean he is liberal. Anyhow, I leave readers to decide what to make of The Jester.
     

Overall, if Truth Social, Trump's social media platform (link to its Wikipedia entry) is where a lot of Right Wingers, Trump supporters, and other conservative firebrands went, over time it seems CoSo is where the Left Wingers went, mainly the harder left wingers and liberals. On the surface, yes, the site can be a bit more polite and less toxic than Twitter. That initial feel is in part also to The Jester's restrictions on the site; it is not a free for all. There are certain sites and domains he blocks outright. However, after a while of using the site, I notice that it is like any other social media platform where you get some nice people and more than a few who are not so nice. The not so nice people tend to be passive aggressive, not so subtle, and often pedantic of the performative type, you know, the folks on the Internet who always have a need to correct others on every other real or more likely perceived offense or infraction. In CoSo, people are more likely to make impertinent comments on a post, make pedantic replies, or otherwise just make a nuisance of themselves until you block them. As I said, it can be a lot like other social media platforms. 

The site's bias leans very strong to the Left. These are not extreme socialists necessarily or such, but they definitely are left of the center, and they will make sure you know it. In addition, if you are a hard Democrat, you are likely to feel at home as many users show strong fealty to that party (at least the U.S. users; the site does draw users from around the world). You say something wrong about the party, and odds are you'll soon get comments trying to "correct" you. 

I soon found myself needing to use the block function. I use it on Twitter too, but I had to really put it to work practically as soon as I began doing some tentative posts. I still do not quite have the filtering right. I am not likely to get it right without working at it. The site, like Twitter, allows you to block/filter out keywords and terms as well as people. One drawback is that once you get a filter on, it stays on and it is hard to remove. On Twitter, I may see in my feed that a post is not shown because I filtered a word or such. I can turn off that filter on the spot to see what it was. CoSo does not allow that, so if I see "this post is filtered" I have no idea why nor can I use do a quick open to see. 

On a positive for some, you can do longer posts than you can on Twitter. 

The site, like many other social media platforms, can have cliques. Additionally, the site is not really that diverse. Part of it may be the kind of users they attract. Another part is that it is just not as big as Twitter, so there is not as much diversity of topics. Some topics, such as books and reading, are fairly scarce in CoSo. Some topics are just non-existent. This is an issue for any social media platform trying to get growth. Twitter certainly has the advantage there due to time and experience. CoSo just lacks the content diversity, and if you do not know a few folks to start it can feel isolating. You would be basically starting over, which I did not mind, but the lack of diversity can be an issue. Other than a lot of politics (left politics), a good amount of "geek stuff" (programming, coding, computers, and such), and some seriously preachy people there is not much else. People tend to be serious to the point of being humorless. Yes you can find some memes, but even those are not enough to get the humor flowing. 

As I wrote at the beginning, I have been on it since April 2022, so about 4 months by now. That was more than enough time for me to kick the tires, give a fair shake, and decide if I want to stay or not. I am leaning towards leaving. CoSo for me feels like I have to be self-censoring and/or avoid certain topics to avoid unwanted attention, or I just have to block obnoxious people fairly often. I already have Twitter fairly well calibrated, so I do not see too much of the toxicity that others often complain about on Twitter. I just don't feel the need to put in the work to calibrate CoSo. To be honest, at this point I would not miss CoSo (and I am sure no one over there would miss me). For all its flaws, I do have a sense of community on Twitter that I know is not going to develop on CoSo anytime soon. 

Would I recommend CoSo to others? Not really, but I would not dissuade anyone from trying it and deciding for themselves. I would say you may be better off setting up a Mastodon account (link to Wikipedia entry and link for the site and opening an account), find an instance of Mastodon you like, and go there instead. Mastodon can be a lot calmer for one. I also set up a Mastodon account (you can find me in the mas.to instance). I will write some thoughts on Mastodon down the road after I use it some more, but so far it is far preferable to CoSo.

The bottom line is that at this point I am no longer using CoSo nor logging in. Deactivating the account is a strong possibility for me, but for now I may just let it go derelict, that's how indifferent I am about it. It may have some good features, but it does not feel right nor worth the effort. I write this post as nothing more than a very average person. I am not a techie or such, so I am writing more as an average person who may hear of the site from the news and decided to try it out. I've tried it out. I was not impressed, but I leave it to my four readers to decide. 



Friday, August 19, 2022

Book Review: Horizontal Vertigo

Juan Villoro, Horizontal Vertigo: a City Called Mexico. New York: Pantheon Books, 2021. ISBN: 9781524748883.
 
Genre: essays
Subgenre: history, urban history, Mexico
Format: hardcover
Source: Berea branch, Madison County (KY) Public Library
 

This is a collection of essays about Mexico City. Horizontal vertigo "refers to the fear of ever-impending earthquakes that led Mexicans to build their capital city outward rather than upward" (from the book's description). The essays take readers from indigenous antiquity, the rise and fall of the Aztecs, the Spanish conquest, independence to modern times up to the 2017 earthquake. 

The essays are arranged into the following topics: 

  • City characters. These are sketches and profiles of specific city characters. 
  • Shocks. 
  • Crossings.
  • Ceremonies.
The author also explains the book's structure a bit further: 
 
"Horizontal Vertigo includes various kinds of testimonial devices. This book combines a multitude of genres, and, in a certain sense, it is various books. Structurally, it follows the criterion of zapping. The episodes do not move forward in linear fashion, but, instead, follow the zigzagging of memory or the detours endemic to city life" (5). 

You can either read the book from beginning to end, or you can pick one of the themes and read those essays. The author, who is also a novelist, writes with a style that blends nonfiction with the feel of fiction. He blends personal memories of growing up and living in the city with keen observations and attention to detail. The result is a very intimate and at times moving portrayal of the city and its people. The author also integrates insights from fields like sociology and economics, yet the book is not a textbook. It's a blend of various narratives as diverse as the many who live in the city from the poor to the very wealthy. 

Essays vary in length, and some are more interesting than others. The book does lend itself more to browsing and reading what interests you than reading it cover to cover. 

A small note that this edition is an English translation from the original Spanish. In my case, I would have preferred to read it in Spanish. The translation is good, but I found some words and concepts, which as a Spanish reader, it is better to read in Spanish. Still, for English readers the translation works well. 

Overall, I liked the book. It could be a bit slow at times, but it is a nice and immersive narrative of the city. This is a good choice for libraries. It is a book I would acquire for our library. I'd buy it in both languages. If your library collects books in Spanish, acquiring a copy in Spanish may be a good option too. 

3 out of 5 stars.

Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Deck Review: Tarot Apokalypsis

Erik C. Dunne (artist/creator) and Kim Huggens (author/writer), Tarot Apokalypsis. Torino, Italy: Lo Scarabeo, 2016. ISBN: 9780738749822. (link to Llewellyn, the U.S. distributor.)
 
Genre: Tarot deck
Subgenre: mystery cults, ancient civilizations
Format: Kit with deck of cards and hardcover book
Source: I own this one 

 
Justice-XI card
I first used this deck during the month of July 2022. After the rough dark month of June 2022, where I was using the Tarot Z deck, along with the Kali Oracle for my weekly oracle card draws, I was tempted to continue using the Tarot Z in July or pick another dark deck for the month. In the end, I wanted something closer to traditional and a bit lighter. The sumptuous Tarot Apokalypsis made for a good choice. On a small side note, the Tarot Z and Kali Oracle made a pretty good match during the month of July 2022. I have the review of the Tarot Z coming soon, and I am in the process at this time of writing the review for the Kali Oracle, so stay tuned. 

I describe this deck and kit as sumptuous because it looks like a more expensive kit. The art for the deck is also great, and we'll get to that. This kit edition includes a hardcover book and a 79-card deck; the deck has an extra card. 

The book is definitely a highlight of this kit. The book is well written, and it has a generous amount of information. The book is arranged as follows: 

  • Foreword.
  • At the Beginning. This is a brief overview of what Tarot is and what the book does. 
    • The Tarot Apokalypsis and revelation. Brief overview of the deck itself and its theme of revelation. 
    • Using Tarot. This includes a discussion on symbols, how to read a card, and how to read a card spread. 
    • Tarot spreads. We get five card spreads. 
  • The Cards. This includes: 
    • Major Arcana. This section's introduction explains how each card is based on a mystery cult, mystery religion, mystical or magical practice. It also includes a table of astrological and Kabbalistic associations for each card. Each card entry includes card name, the mystery/magic the card is based on, mystery (explains the card's mystery), revelation (the card's interpretation including negative aspect). 
    • Minor Arcana. The introduction here tells us the suits of the Minor Arcana depict one of four ancient civilizations: Khmer Empire of Cambodia (Pentacles), Ancient Greece and Rome (Cups), Northern Europe Norse (Swords), and Ancient Egypt (Wands). The introductory text here also goes over elemental associations and a bit of numerology. The card entries here have the same kind of content as the Major Arcana cards. 
    • Court Cards. The introductory text here indicates the court cards depict a deity worshiped in the cultures of the suits. We also get a basic explanation about court cards in general and a table of elements associated with each card. The entries for each card are like entries for the Major and Minor Arcana cards. 
  • Continued Study. This provides some information to keep practicing including how to keep a Tarot journal, on doing a daily draw, the three symbol reading technique, and a small list of books for further reading. 
    • On a small side note, from the provided book list I have read Around the Tarot in 78 Days (link to my review). 

Four of Cups card
This is a very substantial book and not just because it is a bit over 400 pages. The book's author does a
great job with an accessible text. The text is very informative, detailed, and includes footnotes throughout the book. If you want to learn more about the mysteries and civilizations described you can use the footnotes to find additional sources. Do note that sources in the footnotes are not listed in the readings list at the end of the book. The book offers a lot of material to study and work with the cards. To be honest, this is the kind of book the Tarot Illuminati, the deck's companion deck, should have included in the kit instead of the less substantial book that deck got (link to my review of the Tarot Illuminati). In addition to a well written and substantial text, the book is in hardcover, another nice quality detail. This is one of the better deck companion books available. 

The deck features 79 cards. This deck has an extra card: The All-Gifted. This card is not numbered; in the book, it is listed with the Major Arcana. You can either remove it or keep it in the deck. I left it in when using the deck. 

The digital art on this deck is beautiful, colorful, and very opulent. It is very rich in details and symbolism. You get plenty of lush imagery to work on. The cards lean a bit into the Rider Waite Smith (RWS) system, so if you read within that system, you can make the deck work for you. However, the art based on ancient mysteries and civilizations adds unique details and symbols to the cards, and this enriches the reading experience. If you read intuitively, the deck's art and detail offer plenty to draw upon. The figures on the cards are very expressive; you can see the emotions in images that you can spend time studying. For me, this deck reads very well. 

Prince of Wands card
The cards are borderless. Each card is identified by name and number with a small black banner at the bottom of the card. The card back is not reversible. The cards measure about 4 3/4 inches by 2 3/4 inches. The card stock is thing but feels flexible. It also feels durable as long as you don't shuffle them too hard. The cards have a light glossy finish, and they slide well enough without sticking. 

Overall, for me, this is one of the nicest decks in my collection. The kit includes a good companion book that goes beyond the standard basic book you find with most decks that come with a book. The cards feature beautiful art with a variety of themes yet the overall structure is clear and coherent. The art is rich in detail and color. This is a deck I know I can back and spend a lot of time studying it, and it is also a good deck to read. This is a deck kit I highly recommend and would not want to do without. The deck can work for beginners, but it may be more for intermediate and up practitioners. Still, it can make a good gift for any practitioner. On a final note, these days you can buy the deck individually, but I would say if you can get the kit.

5 out of 5 stars. 

This kit qualifies for the following 2022 Reading Challenge: 



Monday, August 15, 2022

Book Review: The I-5 Killer

Ann Rule, The I-5 Killer: the True Story of an NFL Draftee Who Became a Perverted Serial Killer. New York: Berkley, 2022. ISBN: 9780593441374.
 
Genre: nonfiction
Subgenre: true crime, 1980s, serial killers
Format: trade paperback
Source: Berea branch, Madison County (KY) Public Library 


 
Randall Woodfield seemed to have it all in his youth: award winning student and athlete, drafted  by the Green Bay Packers, and chosen by Playgirl as a centerfold candidate, or so this book's description would have us believe. To be honest, that description leaves out a lot. Randy basically failed with Green Bay and was basically let go by the team. He did submit photos to the magazine, but he was never chosen as a centerfold. What the book's back blurb does get right is that he did leave a trail of victims along the I-5 corridor. The man was a monster who basically raped and robbed and murdered through California, Oregon, and Washington. 

The events described in the book happened in the early 1980s. This 2022 edition is a reprint of a book published in 1984 with an update at the end of the book that was added in 1988. 

Rule first introduces us to the crimes in the prologue to set up the story. Then the story starts with Beth Wilmot's case. After that, the narrative goes between Randy's life and crimes, his victims, and the police officers and prosecutors working to capture him. Since Randy was so mobile, initially it was very difficult to connect the various crimes. As Randy wanders up and down Interstate 5 we wonder if he will be caught. Gradually the difference police agencies come together, with some issues, start comparing notes, and eventually Randy becomes their subject. Once the puzzle pieces come together, it's the end for Randy, for the most part. 

Rule writes a pretty dramatic narrative, able to weave back and forth between Randy, victims, and law enforcement. The pace does slow down a bit in the middle of the book, but once the cops start working together the pace picks up until he gets caught, taken to trial, and convicted. 

To be honest, I am amazed at how charming Randy could appear to women. I've seen the photos in the book. He is not all that. All he really had was his jock physique and a strong ability to manipulate women, the younger the better. He learned early on what to say and how to say it to push women's buttons. Granted, some older women saw right through him, but many women overall did not. Still, the ones he could not manipulate he also hurt anyhow. Even in prison, via letters, he could still manipulate women. Part of me wondered just what the hell women saw in this loser who never really had gainful employment, but we do have to give the devil his due. Randy, maybe not too smart, certainly was a master manipulator. That and many women were unable or unwilling to see the red flags made for terrible outcomes. 

Overall, the book was interesting, but the pace was inconsistent. The story still holds up today, though I wonder if he could've been caught sooner if it happened today given better technology. Fans of true crime will likely enjoy this one. In the end, I liked it. 

3 out of 5 stars. 

* * * * * 

Additional reading notes: 

This book is in one way a cop tale, and in typical cop story fashion cops from different places have difficulty playing nice: 
 
"And then the specter of territorial rights raised its ugly head" (170). 
 
After all, whoever got the guy would get credit and fame. 
 
What Randy really was: 
 
"He was quite probably the most prolific sexual criminal in Oregon criminal history. He would garner far more headlines over the next months and years in this role than he ever had as a star athlete" (210). 
 
On Randy's lawyers: 
 
"Randy Woodfield was indigent; all of his attorneys were supplied by the taxpayers of Oregon" (273). 
 
Lucky for Randy, unlike most people who often get subpar lawyers as public defenders, Randy had some seriously competent, high end lawyers appointed by the courts. He certainly got a good defense in his trials. 
 
On Randy and women, his manipulation: 
 
"There is a bleak irony in how well Randy Woodfield understands women. For a male who has demonstrated over and over an almost visceral hatred for the opposite sex, he knows just which buttons to push, when to be forceful, when to offer tenderness" (280). 
 
 


Friday, August 12, 2022

Book Review: Dangerous Ideas

Eric Berkowitz, Dangerous Ideas: a Brief History of Censorship in the West, from the Ancients to Fake News. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2021. ISBN: 9780807036242.
 
Genre: history
Subgenre: politics, human rights
Format: e-book galley
Source: Edelweiss Plus 

 
This book is a history of the censorship of ideas and how it has shaped civilization. One of the author's key claims is that everyone engages in some form of censorship or attempt to censor something at some point in time. The author also argues that censorship serves to prop up governments and regimes as well as to promote and uphold class and gender disparities. The history covers from the Chinese emperors to the United States in the Trump era and various instances of censorship around the world in between. The author presents the history to illuminate his argument against censorship. You may or not agree with parts of his argument, but the book is relevant to the current times. 
 
The book is arranged into seven chapters plus an introduction, an afterword, and a set of notes. 
 
While the topic is timely and relevant, this is not an engaging read. Most of this book reads like a history school textbook, and it is not in a good way. Like old history textbooks, a lot of the emphasis is on dates, people, and deeds. The author makes his argument along the way, but at time it gets lost in the events. The text is not exactly compelling making for some pretty dry reading. I wanted to like this book more, but it is just not that interesting as written. This is not a book your average nonfiction reader would pick up for pleasure reading. 
 
One point the author may miss is when certain groups weaponize censorship such as the current right wing partisan (and often theocratic) attacks on libraries. Much of the emphasis in the book is in government censorship, not much when a loud segment of citizens do the censoring, and the government does nothing, or worse goes along with it. When such groups force a library closure over an LGBT book, as it happened this month in Michigan, that is a problem. We do get some discussion on the oversized role of media and Internet companies towards the end of the book. Also the author addresses a bit on social media and its use by certain groups, but he still seems to cling to the "give the people power" and don't censor. Letting those people go run roughshod is certainly not in society's best interest. Still, the author clings to "censorship does not work" but offers little in way of options: 

"Indeed, one of the key points of this book is that censorship doesn't work. The ideas animating suppressed speech remain in circulation and, in the end, can become more effective for being forbidden" (8, emphasis in the original). 

Meanwhile, I would argue the United States fall short given its fetishizing of the First Amendment, which the author describes: 

"The right to freedom of expression in the modern US is exalted to the point where most speech is protected unless violence or lawlessness is imminent. If vicious remarks cause pain, fear, or loss of dignity, the law, with few exceptions, simply does not care" (200). 

And right wing extremists in the United States know that, and along with social media companies, have weaponized and made profits out of nurturing pain, fear, and loss of dignity to others. The "fuck your feelings" crowd is doing quite well in the United States protected by the First Amendment regardless of consequences. At this point, I think back to that quote in the book Gangsters Vs. Nazis (link to my review):

"It is important to non-Jews as well as to Jews. Any nation which permits a minority to live in fear of persecution is a nation which invites disaster" -- Professor L.B. Namier.

The U.S. is basically inviting disaster as long as nothing is done for the sake of the oh so precious First Amendment while libraries are forced to close and some members of society have to fear loud and often violent extremists. Towards the end of the book, the author sort of cops out: 

"There is little agreement at this point about what censorship is, much less whether it is a good or bad thing" (201, emphasis in the original).

 
Despite the relatively dry text, I would still recommend it for libraries, both public and academic. My library did acquire it for our collection. This is a book that does make some important points and provides some context for current events like the current censorship sprees happening in public and school libraries in the United States. I just wish the book was not such a drag to read. In the end it was OK. 
 
2 out of 5 stars. 
 
This book qualifies for the following 2022 Reading Challenge: 
 

 
 
 

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

Book Review: Gangsters Vs. Nazis

Michael Benson, Gangsters Vs. Nazis: How Jewish Mobsters Battled Nazis in Wartime America. New York: Kensington Publishing, 2022. ISBN: 9780806541792.
 
Genre: U.S. history, mobsters
Subgenre: Jewish history in the United States
Format: print galley
Source: Review copy provided by publisher in exchange for an honest review 

 
This book is a collection of true stories about Jewish gangsters fighting against Nazis and Nazi sympathizers on U.S. soil. While bigotry and antisemitism, along with racism, have always been problems in the United States, prior to World War II, antisemites and a significant segment of German Americans were emboldened by Hitler's rise in Europe. These American Nazis hoped to bring Hitler's vision to the United States and overthrow American democracy. They did not count on the patriotism of Jewish American gangsters. When many Americans were either indifferent or conveniently ignorant, Jewish gangsters organized and fought these Nazi groups. The author collects their stories in this book. 
 
I knew from other readings about Lucky Luciano helping the U.S war effort. Before that, the German American Bund, the Silver Shirts, and other fascist bigoted groups were actively trying to take over the United States. Jews were in their sights, and soon members of Jewish communities called on their local Jewish gangsters to help. The gangsters were not only patriotic; they were glad to help and prove that Jews would not go down quietly. 

I mentioned this is a collection of stories because it was a nationwide struggle. From the East Coast to the Midwest to the West Coast, if American Nazis tried to have their meetings, Jewish gangsters were there to bust them up. Some gangsters were better financed; some had cops in their pockets, but some cops also tried to protect the Nazis, or rather their freedom of assembly rights that those Nazis were weaponizing (not unlike certain right wing party weaponizing the First Amendment in the present time, but I digress). The gangsters also often had discreet support from local politicians and community members. The fight against Nazism in the United States took various forms, and the author does try to convey as many stories as he can. 

The book is arranged in seven parts with 29 chapters. The chapters vary in length, but many are pretty short at a few pages. This allows for swift reading. In addition, the book has a preface, an introduction, and an epilogue. The book also includes a list of sources including other books, newspapers and periodicals, and websites. As you read you can tell the book is well researched. The author often uses periodicals from the time as primary sources to help tell the stories. 

The narrative is pretty good. There can be a slow moment here or there, but a lot of the story move at a good pace. Much of the story is riots and other meeting disruptions, so some events may blue a bit, i.e. seems like the same kind of event repeats in different places. An interesting element in the book are the stories of the various gangsters. 

This is a book about a part of U.S. history that few people may know about. Yes, the U.S. had a Nazi past (you could argue it still does have a Nazi and fascist present), which many in the U.S. often ignore. Thus this is a must read. It is a book that reveals a part of U.S. history mostly forgotten until now. This is the kind of book that in the right hands could make a good documentary or television series. The author's writing is very visual. I could see this book as material for a series in one of the streaming services. 

This is a book I recommend for public libraries. Readers who enjoy books on U.S. history and/or crime history, especially mobster stories, will likely enjoy this book. I'd consider it optional for academic libraries unless they have strong 20th century U.S. history holdings. 

Overall, I really liked this one, and it is one I would recommend for others to read. 

4 out of 5 stars. 

* * * * * 

Additional reading notes: 
 
A nice touch throughout the books are the epigraphs the author uses, for example: 
 
"It is important to non-Jews as well as to Jews. Any nation which permits a minority to live in fear of persecution is a nation which invites disaster." -- Professor L.B. Namier (qtd. in 5). 
 
Professor Namier's quote is still very relevant and applicable today. 
 
 
Not all German Americans were Nazis, but the ones that were Nazis were very dangerous: 
 
"There were upward of twelve million Germans in the United States during the Depression, and Bund membership represented 0.4 percent of that number, one in five hundred. But the believers, that 0.2 percent, were zealous and dangerous. By 1933, there were more than one hundred anti-Semitic groups in the U.S., functioning openly and in evangelical mode" (19). 
 
 
Much like today, fascists in the U.S. had supporters back then too: 
 
"The message also resonated with the Christian Right groups like Defenders of the Christian Faith, which was already suspicious of anyone belonging to a non-Jesus religion, and to capitalists who liked the idea that no one hated communism more than a fascist" (19). 
 
 
On the U.S. influencing the Nazis including having influence on Hitler: 
 
"Much was written about Germany's influence on German Americans, much less so about America's influence on Hitler and the policies of the Nazi Party. Hitler, it seemed, was a student of U.S. history, and he took note when reading about the New World and its centuries of race slavery" (31). 
 
 
Regarding the above, Benson lists two relevant books in his list of sources: 
 
The next epigraph, which opens Part 5 of the book, if you modify it slightly, it sounds just like today's U.S. Republican Party and U.S. theocrats: 

"We will undermine the morale of the people of America. Once there is confusion and after we have succeeded in undermining the faith of the American people in their own government, a new group will take over; this will be the German-American group, and we will help them assume power." --Adolph Hitler, 1933. 

This quote from Minneapolis Municipal Judge William C. Larson shows how to handle hate speech, and no, not as deserving freedom of speech but rather as the equivalent to causing/provoking a riot: 

"There can be no more potent breeder of public disorder, than a deliberate stirring up of class against class, and race against race. This  undermines the patriotic unity of our nation, and is in direct opposition to that tolerance of race and religion which our constitution provides for, and which is a distinguishing feature of the fundamental law of our land, one of its great cornerstones essential to the peace and safety of any community" (190-191). 






Friday, August 05, 2022

Book Review: Shadowman, Volume 1 (2021)

Cullen Bunn, et.al., Shadowman, Volume 1 (2021). New York: Valiant Entertainment, 2021. ISBN: 9781682153741.
 
Genre: graphic novels and comics
Subgenre: horror, occult, folklore, heroes
Format: e-book galley
Source: NetGalley 

 
This series is a new discovery for me, and this particular volume was excellent. This volume collects issues of the comic 1-4 of the 2021 run so far. 

John Boniface is the Shadowman, a New Orleans musician bound to the Shadow Loa, a powerful voodoo spirit. This gives him supernatural powers, but it also brings responsibilities for him. In this adventure, dark forces attempt to open passages between our reality and the dead side. It is up to Shadowman to close those openings and put things right. 

For starters, the art in this book is very good. Early on Shadowman and Baron Samedi look very good. I particularly liked the sort of dark and fun portrayal of Baron Samedi. The art overall is colorful and can be a bit evocative. 
 
The story itself is good and well paced. After a brief introductory note, we get right into the story. As we read on, the story grows in complexity as Shadowman works to figure out who is responsible for the breaks in the veil of reality. Baron Samedi comes along, sometimes helpful, other times not so much. He can come across as a bit of a trickster. Samedi's interactions with Shadowman are one of the things that make this a good comic. The story draws you in. I basically read this in one sitting, enjoying the plot and various details along the way. 

In addition, this volume includes a gallery of images, sketches, and covers, It also features some commentary from the author and artist. The commentary on Baron Samedi is worth reading. 

Overall, this is very good. I highly recommend it for libraries with comic book collections. Readers who enjoy comics with occult, horror, and/or folklore elements will likely enjoy this one. I am looking forward to a second volume. So far, one of my best reads for 2022. 

5 out of 5 stars. 

This book qualifies for the following 2022 Reading Challenge: 



Short book review: Pearls Hogs the Road: a Pearls Before Swine Treasury

Stephan Pastis, Pearls Hogs the Road: a Pearls Before Swine Treasury. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel, 2017.  ISBN: 9781449487324.
 
Genre: comics
Subgenre: humor, life observations
Format: e-book
Source: via Hoopla from Madison County (KY) Public Library 

 
This was an entertaining and fun collection of comics to read. These comics have a good blend of humor, sarcasm, and cynicism; they are perfect for the Hard Times we live in. In addition, Pastis includes commentaries on many of the strips which add to the humor and/or offer additional insights into the comics and his craft. Sometimes a comic strip may not work out as well as he thought it should, and he is often transparent and open about it, which I think adds to the series' appeal. 

I found myself laughing often while reading this. Some of the puns Pastis does work better than others, but overall the humor is good with a bit of dark humor here or there. This is not a cuddly comic series, but it is a funny one overall. 
 
This volume covers strips appearing in newspapers from March 3, 2014 to September 6, 2015. In addition, this volume features 3 comic strips illustrated by Bill Watterson, author of Calvin and Hobbes.

4 out of 5 stars.

Wednesday, August 03, 2022

Book Review: Tarot and Tequila

David Ross, Tarot and Tequila: a Tarot Guide with Cocktails. New York: Tiller Press, 2021. ISBN: 97819982169381.
 
Genre: nonfiction
Subgenre: Tarot, cocktails, recipes
Format: e-book galley
Source: NetGalley 

 
I like Tarot, and I like tequila, so I figured this would be an interesting book to read. It does not quite live up to the expectations. 

The publisher describes this book as a "positive and spiritually uplifting guide that includes basic and humorous tequila-inspired meanings for all 78 tarot cards." The book also contains 40 tequila based cocktail recipes. There is a recipe for each Major Arcana card and then some additional cocktails for selected Minor Arcana cards. In the book, the author explains how he paired the cocktails with the cards based on card attributes. 

We need to look at this book as a Tarot guide and as a cocktail recipes book. 

As a Tarot book, the card meanings and interpretations are fairly basic. The author does use a very casual and relaxed tone in providing the card interpretations. The card interpretations include: basic definition, reversed basic definition, tequila definition, and reversed tequila definition. Think of the tequila definitions a bit more in terms of bar and drinking culture life. Depending on how much or how little you relate to bard and drinking culture you may or not relate to these meanings and definitions. At the end of the day, the card interpretations overall are very basic. As a Tarot book, this book is at the beginner's level. There is not much here for the advanced Tarot users. As a Tarot book, it is nice but optional especially if you have more comprehensive Tarot books. 

As a cocktail book, it's like every other artsy cocktail book. Recipes vary in difficulty to make, mostly trending to complicated. Some ingredients are not easy to get and/or require some significant work to make such as making infusions, for example an espresso infused tequila for the Negroni that is the Fool's Cocktail. Your ability to make some of these at home with very basic ingredients may be low. I say that as someone with a small basic liquor cabinet; many ingredients mentioned would be difficult to make or acquire for the average person at home. In that sense, this book is not unlike many bar and cocktail books that feature nice photos of cocktails and exotic recipes no average person can make at home. Except there are no photos in this book. 

The book is illustrated with some nice art from the author's Tarot deck, the Sugar Skull Tarot deck (sold separately). The illustrations, in the galley are black and white. After a bit of searching, I found that they are in color in the final book edition. The art style is nice, simple, and can be a bit playful. You do not need the author's deck to read and enjoy the boo, but if you really like the book you might consider getting the deck. 

Overall, I thought the book was OK. It reflects the author's trade of doing Tarot at parties and corporate events, i.e. it feels more like a party book. I am not saying that is a bad thing. I think Tarot can be playful, happy, and yes, something you can do over cocktails. This book is just pretty lightweight. It feels and reads more like a coffee table book than a book for serious Tarot practice. 
 
This is a book to borrow. For public libraries this could be an optional selection, especially if they already collect other books on Tarot, cartomancy, divination, and other esoterica. Or public libraries could select it as they would any other cocktail recipes book. Not recommended for academic libraries. It is not one I would buy for my academic library. 

2 out of 5 stars. 
 
* * * * * 

Some additional reading notes: 

On forming connections through Tarot: 

"When I obliged, I found that by reading a person's cards we became somehow connected. People surprisingly opened up to me and we would have these intense emotional conversations that meant more to me than I would have ever expected" (8).

On Tarot cards as a useful tool: 

"For me, tarot cards are a very useful tool that can be used to help people work through their problems in their lives. Whether it be through a tarot reading or by meditating on the cards for yourself, there are many lessons that can be learned through their symbolism and interpretations" (8). 

On so many Tarot books out there: 

"I eventually realized that I was buying essentially the same book with some small variations and differences" (11). 

I found that statement about Tarot books refreshing, that the author could say that. Now, I am not as experienced nor as advanced as many Tarotistas out there, but I am making that discovery as well. While I know my cartomancy learning continues I do feel that I need to be more selective about what Tarot and cartomancy books I choose to read. Life is too short to just read aimlessly, especially in this cartomancy journey. 
 
This book qualifies for the following 2022 Reading Challenge: 
 

 


Monday, August 01, 2022

Media Notes: Roundup for July 2022

                           




This is a somewhat random selection of the movies and series on DVD and/or online I watched during July 2022.


Movies and films (links to IMDB.com for basic information unless noted otherwise). Some of these I watched via TubiTv.com or other online source. The DVDs come from the public library (unless noted otherwise). In addition, I will try to add other trivia notes, such as when a film is based on a book adding the information about the book (at least the WorldCat record if available). 

A bit of good and not so good this month. I'd say The Divine Fury was the highlight for new to me films. Monsters of Man was also pretty good.


  • Monsters of Man (2020. Science Fiction. Action. Thriller. Australian film). Plot description: "A US weapons manufacturer tests its 4 killer robots on heroin producers in the Golden Triangle in Southeast Asia. It goes haywire." Film has Neil McDonough in it, so that is a good start. To complicate things, when the four robots land, one of them is damaged due to is parachute not opening all the way, so it goes rogue in relation to the other three. When the three robots invade a village, they not only eliminate any drug runners, they also kill anyone else. Meanwhile, the 4th robot, the rogue, since it is not connected as the others are, well, starts becoming self aware and learning. Now a small group of medical students on a mission need to escape and try to survive. The medical students vary in degree of how irritating they are, not to mention clueless (like what the heck? they get sent to the middle of a jungle with no jungle training let alone skill to read a map) and no common sense. I guess the medical mission group just sends coddled city kids into jungles without any support or training. A small detail, but somewhat irritating. We do not see McDonough's CIA character much, but when he is on, he does a good performance as the cold and ruthless mission leader. Jose Rosete as Boller, the handler keeping the technicians in line is the one that really puts in a performance; he is serious and scary. You would not want to cross him. As for the survivors, as typical in thrillers, at times they make one or two decisions that are not too bright, but they find themselves learning quickly. Overall this is a pretty good thriller. Has good blend of action, government conspiracy, suspense, and killer robots. There is even a little bit of drama as the rogue robot, who is becoming sentient, tries to figure out who it is. The story has a good pace and keeps it up. There are no slow spots really in the film. A pretty good film that keeps the thrills going to the very end. This is the a good entry in the tech gone wrong genre. Really liked this one, so 4.5 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/2.
  • Sister Wrath (2008. Action. Comedy. a.k.a. Nun of That). Plot description: "Nun of That is an action-comedy that follows Sister Kelly Wrath as she transforms from a nun with a simple temper problem to a vengeful killer." Similar to Machete in the sense that it is a movie that came out of a mock movie trailer. Sister Kelly is a nun with a temper and an attitude who takes no guff, traits that may not be that good for a nunnery but will work well for the clandestine vigilante church group she will be joining when she comes back from the dead. You see, she gets killed in an alley, but then in the afterlife gets trained by some ascended masters including Jesus, then sent back to Earth to continue the order's mission. She will be a sanctified crusader to kill and take out the criminals and others who deserve to die; they are not getting saved anyways. It is a silly movie. The acting is not great to be honest; it can be a bit stiff at times, and some lines are bad. But it is also a pretty fun vigilante movie with a touch of nunsploitation (in the gun toting nuns). On a side note, the movie was released in 2008, but the setting is in the 1970s or so, which adds a bit to the exploitation element. Overall, it was silly, fun at times, some bad lines that can be laughable. I was not too thrilled with the ending, but it was alright for the film. The musical number by the way was good. I liked it, so I'd say 3.5 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/3. Side note: needless to say if you are overly religious and/or lack a sense of humor, this movie is not for you. It plays with every other religion, belief, and an ethnic stereotype or two. For everyone else, pretty good fun for a late weekend night. 
  • Agatha Christie's Death on the Nile (1978. Crime. Drama. Mystery. Literary Adaptation). Plot description: "As Hercule Poirot enjoys a luxurious cruise down the Nile, a newlywed heiress is found murdered on board. Can Poirot identify the killer before the ship reaches the end of its journey?" This is the 1978 adaptation of Christie's novel with Peter Ustinov as Hercule Poirot. I have seen Ustinov in the role in Evil Under the Sun (link to my review). While Ustinov may not be my favorite Poirot-- I like David Suchet in the role better-- the films Ustinov made are just beautiful films overall, and they always have a very good cast of seriously good actors. They are worth watching just for the good performances and beautiful cinematography and scenery. Cast in this one includes David Niven, Mia Farrow, Bette Davis, Angela Lansbury, and George Kennedy among other stars.As I mentioned before, I thought I had seen this years ago, likely with mom who did favor Ustinov in the role. Anyhow, I found it now, and I decided to watch it again. For starters, the soundtrack and music are very good here. It does start a little slow, but that is because they spend a bit of time introducing the characters before they all meet on that fateful Nile River cruise. It may be slow, but small details are revealed, and the viewer should be attentive. Poirot certainly is, and I do enjoy watching those small details as well. On an interesting note, Lansbury is playing a romance novelist, and she plays it up. The dance scene early in the film where she forces Col. Race (Niven) to dance a tango is amusing; he does not dance well by his admission, but the lady does want his company. As often happens in Christie's novels and the movies, everyone is a suspect, and anyone could be the killer. The victim pretty much has enemies everywhere. It falls to Poirot to sort it all out. To keep it interesting, not only did the rest of the passengers have motive to kill the victim, but a number of them had opportunity as well; the movie does well in recreating those moments of opportunity as Poirot presents them while investigating. Thing is soon others start dying too, and as they do, the suspense builds. The movie does have some small humorous moments that add to the overall ambiance. On another small side note, Miss Bowers (Maggie Smith) looked quite fetching in that feminine tuxedo she wore in one of the scenes (what can I say? I do like a lady in a suit once in a while). For the record, the heiress's murder happens halfway through the film, and we got quite the buildup to get there. I like this movie better than the previous one I saw in part because Ustinov does not play Poirot's eccentricities as much; I thought he overdid it a bit in the other film. Otherwise, he does a very good performance here, a bit more serious, which I appreciated more. The other actors' performances are great too. The scene at the end when all is revealed is a classic. Overall, this is a pretty good adaptation, very lavish, and as good as I remembered it. It is also just very good movie to watch for the setting and ambiance. I am willing to give it the full 5 out of 5 stars. On a bonus for me, I think appreciate Ustinov a bit better here, and I can see better why mom liked him so much in the role. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/4.
    • Ustinov has portrayed Poirot in six films, though only three were released in theaters. In addition to this one, and Evil Under the Sun, he has done 1985's Thirteen at Dinner (TV movie), 1986's Dead Man's Folly (TV movie), 1986's Murder in Three Acts (TV movie), and 1988's Appointment with Death. At this point, I am curious enough that I may seek out the others. Turns out TubiTv has at this time Appointment With Death, so added it to the watch list. I will have to check if my local library has the others.
    • Side note: At the end of the film, Poirot makes reference to a previous case, the Murder on the Orient Express.  Sadly for us, Ustinov did not make a film version of that. I wonder what that might have been like. 
  • Conan the Barbarian (1982. Action. Adventure. Fantasy. Literary adaptation). Plot description: "A young boy, Conan, becomes a slave after his parents are killed and tribe destroyed by a savage warlord and sorcerer, Thulsa Doom. When he grows up he becomes a fearless, invincible fighter. Set free, he plots revenge against Thulsa Doom." This is the classic film where Arnold Schwarzenegger plays the title role, one of the films that made him famous. James Earl Jones portrays Thulsa Doom. Max Von Sydow makes a brief appearance as King Osric, delivers a great line about the love of a father for his daughter. The movie may not be a perfect adaptation, but I would say it is pretty good. It does capture the essence of Robert E. Howard's tales. It also has good cinematography and great outdoors settings. If you like fantasy and swords films, this is a very good one. It has action, story, adventure, a bit of romance, some sorcery and magic, and a tale of revenge. To be honest, the film holds up very well to this day, and it will likely hold up for many years more. The movie also has a very good music soundtrack. I've seen the movie a few times, and I always enjoy it. For me, a 5 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/9.
    • Film is based on the Conan stories by Robert E. Howard. I've read some graphic novel adaptations of the tales (you can find reviews on this blog). 
    • Fun as the movie is, and it is, when you think about it, Thulsa Doom is a bit like a modern day televangelist in the sense that he goes from a pillaging warrior to set up a cult as a path to wealth. Unlike a modern huckster, Thulsa Doom did have dark magic. It is still a very good film, and James Earl Jones does a good job portraying the cult sorcerer. 
  • Conan the Destroyer (1984. Action. Fantasy. Adventure. Literary Adaptation). Plot description: "Conan leads a ragtag group of adventurers on a quest for a princess." Arnold Schwarzenegger returns for another turn portraying Conan. He takes on the task to lead the princess and her bodyguard to find a rare artifact that will awaken Dagon, a god of dreams. To entice Conan, the queen who hires him claims she can use her magic to bring back Valeria, his dead lover (from the previous film). Along the way, he meets again with the Akiro the Wizard (portrayed by Mako, from the first film) and befriends the warrior Zula (a very cool role done by Grace Jones). The character of Subatai does not return, so we have the thief Malak as Conan's new thief companion (portrayed by Tracey Walter). Malak also adds a bit of comic relief here or there. Soon Conan finds he is for quite an adventure with deceit, and he will need his strength and wits to save the day and the princess. The film's music soundtrack is good, nice adventure tone, but not quite as majestic as it was in the first film. It reflects a bit that this movie is meant to be a bit more fun and less serious as the previous one. Just a bit of difference. The tone overall of the film is lighter, with some humor additions here or there. You can feel they tried to make Conan a bit more family friendly, but if you have read the tales you know Conan is not a family friendly character. The story is a bit thin, but it is your basic adventure quest. Is it as good as the first one? No, but it is still decent entertainment. Pacing in some parts slows down a bit, but overall if you like fantasy films this is still enjoyable. In the end, I like it, so willing to give it a 3.5 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/10.
    • On a trivia note, Andre Roussimoff, who many may have known as Andre the Giant the professional wrestler, does an uncredited role as Dagoth.
  • BloodRayne (2005. Horror. Fantasy. Action. Video game adaptation). Plot description: "In the eighteenth century, a vampire escapes from the freak show, in which she once participated, and teams up with a group of vampire slayers to kill the man who raped her mother." Actually, BloodRayne is a dhampir, a half human half vampire. The movie does deviate significantly from the original video game's premise. The game is originally set in World War II; film is set back in the late 18th century or so. One thing the movie has going for it is a decent cast including Michelle Rodriguez, Michael Madsen, and Ben Kingsley (who often gets dragged into films like this when they need an evil patriarch figure; he is the evil vampire patriarch here). Kristanna Loken does well enough as the title character, but that feels mostly adequate. For folks paying attention, she was the Terminator TX in the third Terminator film. For starters though, one of those movies with a long opening sequence of credits, scenery, and ominous music, the kind of opening you feel is a bit of filler. The movie does have some nice scenery, and it looks good here and there. The story however had potential, but the execution is slow, not that interesting to be honest. Once Rayne escapes and gets on her quest to find an artifact, it becomes a race. The vampires want the artifact and hope she finds it for them and then to kill her. The Brimstone Society, a vampire slayer society, hope to find the artifact as well, but they also have some intrigues going on within their depleted ranks. Three artifacts, body parts of an old powerful vampire, if reunited could make a vampire seriously powerful, and this is what the evil old vampire seeks. (One does wonder why did they not just burn all of the ancient vampire instead of dismembering him, but then, we would not have a movie.) This is an hour and forty minutes movie, and most of that time it just drags, and the good actors seem wasted; heck, they feel like they are dragging feet to get through the movie. In addition, it just has a few scenes that feel unnecessary, including that one montage close to the end that seems pretty pointless. Overall, this was pretty bad. The story was not that good. The action was fairly minimal, and not that good. This is one to skip. 1 out of 5 stars, and barely. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/16.
    • Movie is based, very loosely, on a video game of the same name. By now, there is a whole media franchise including three games, the films, and even a comic book.  
    • There are two more sequels, but based on this one I am in no rush to watch them.
  •  Ten Little Indians (1989. Mystery. Crime. Thriller. Literary Adaptation). Plot description: "Ten people are invited to go on an African safari, only to find that an unseen person is killing them one by one. Could one of them be the killer?" I will note I am coming to this without having read the novel it is based on, which I understand is one of Christie's best. Cast here includes Donald Pleasence (one of those good actors you often see in small roles here or there. Some folks may recall him from the Halloween films), Brenda Vaccaro, and Frank Stallone. The issue is to see what the ten folks have in common, if anything, and why they were invited to an isolated spot in Africa by an absent host. Soon they learn through a gramophone recording that their host brought them there due to crimes each person has committed. At this point, the connection is not clear as each individual has their own crime. So where does Owen, the absent host come in, what is his motivation? Justice? Revenge? Gradually we get some details as characters speak of their past, but also they start dying. The movie overall is not bad, but it is not great either. The suspense is decent enough.  It does not have the original book's ending, but as I understand none of the movie adaptations do (Hollywood likes nicer endings). The acting was average, not bad. Pleasence does the best acting overall. I thought it was OK, so 2 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/16.
    • This is another of various adaptations of Agatha Christie's Ten Little Indians; the book is now known as And Then There Were None (to expunge the racist reference).  The original  title comes from a reference to an old rhyme, that plays a key part of the plot. After seeing this film, I am curious to go read the book.
    • Interestingly enough, this is a Cannon Group film. I had no idea prior to seeing this they ever made anything like adapting an Agatha Christie novel, albeit with some significant liberties such as the setting. The original book takes place in a private island; the film takes place during a safari train journey. 
  •  And Then There Were None (1945. Mystery. Drama. Crime. Literary Adaptation). Plot description: "Seven guests, a newly hired secretary and two staff are gathered at a manor house on an isolated island by an unknown absentee host and are killed off one-by-one. They work together to determine who the killer is before it's too late." This is the 1945 adaptation of the Agatha Christie novel. I saw TubiTv had it, and since I had seen some positive reviews I figured I'd give it a chance. One thing I often like about older movies like this one is the music soundtrack. They really put in some good work to provide some dramatic music. Then there are the little details. For example, in one scene, it is storming outside, and as the remaining people are working out clues, when a revelation is made, the lightning goes off (naturally, adding to the dramatic effect). Overall, this is a pretty good movie. It is more somber than the 1989 adaptation I watched. I know the book was adapted into a play, and in a way, this film feels a lot like watching a good play. The actors all do their parts well, and we do focus on the actors and what they do. The setting does feel isolated, and the story keeps the suspense until the very end. It may have a slow moment here or there, but overall it is a good mystery. I did like it, so willing to give it a 3.5 out of 5 stars.  If anything, this makes me more curious about reading the book. Watched 7/17. 
  • The Divine Fury (2019. Action. Horror. Thriller. South Korean film). Plot description: "An MMA fighter helps an exorcist fight evil." Park Seo-joon loses his father. His father was a police officer and a single father; he gets killed during a traffic stop. Father and son are very devout, but the boy loses his faith after his father dies. Back then we already get a hint of the supernatural as the killers may have been possessed; also his father appears to Park after death (in a dream, brief but moving scene). 20 years later, Park becomes a very successful Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighter. He is also obsessed with getting revenge against God for letting his father die. Soon the signs begin to let him know not all is right, and he reluctantly accepts help from a priest who is also an exorcist. They need to work together to fight the evil in the city, led by one known as the Dark Bishop. Overall, the film blends suspense with a bit of horror and a bit of drama. The story builds up gradually as Park comes to accept his role. The film also has a moving moment here or there too. The story is good, and it moves at a good pace. Movie additionally has some interesting details in terms of the religious and cult elements. The movie is a good thriller, and folks who enjoy horror and stories of exorcists and demons will likely enjoy this one. To be honest, a lot better than a lot of the dreck Hollywood puts out, and another example why I am enjoying many Asian films. I really liked it, so willing to give it 4.5 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/24. 
 
 
 
Television and other series (basic show information links via Wikipedia unless noted otherwise). Some of these come in DVD from the public library. Others may be via YouTube, which, as noted before, I keep finding all sorts of other old shows in it, often full episodes:


  •  George Carlin: George's Best Stuff (1990. Stand up comedy). This is a retrospective program containing material from 1977 to 1990. Description: "This special edition looks at his famous Seven dirty words, baseball and football, losing things, dogs and cats, stuff and monopoly." I love his baseball and football routine. Overall, as a selection, there are some routines better than others, but overall this is a pretty good compilation of some classics. One of the things he was good at, especially in the early days was asking those small random observational questions. 4 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/4.
  • George Carlin: Doin' it Again (1990. Stand up comedy). Plot description: "George Carlin brings his comedy back to New Jersey and this time talks about Offensive Language, Euphemisms, They're Only Words, Dogs, Things you never hear, see or wanna hear, Some people are stupid, Cancer, Feminists, Good Ideas, Rape, Life's moments, and organ donors." The special first starts with some highlights from previous shows. Then the actual show starts. His routine here about dogs is amusing and bittersweet at times as he remembers the dogs in his life and gets the audience to perhaps remember theirs. His take on stupid people is spot on, and oh so relevant still. This special is from the 1990s, but his take on language and groups, including feminists (he gets it when it comes to feminists), who use it for control is also very relevant now. Overall, a very good performance as Carlin is moving into his latter stage, the more philosophical stage where he really makes folks think. 4.5 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 7/10.
  • Iron Chef (1993-1999). I continue watching this full run via TubiTv. I am almost done with the fifth season.