Showing posts with label W.W. Norton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label W.W. Norton. Show all posts

Friday, July 24, 2026

Book review: Esther's Army

Katie Gaddini, Esther's Army: the Christian women who power the American right. New York: W.W. Norton, 2026.

Genre: politics, women
Subgenre: U.S. politics, American history
Format: e-book galley
Source: Edelweiss Plus  

 

Let's start with a brief description of the book, from the publisher: 

"How and why right-wing Christian women have risen to the forefront of American politics."  

I read this book in part because I am a believer in knowing my enemy, and right wingers who seek take away my rights and those of others in my circle certainly are an enemy. Within that bunch, right wing conservative women are seriously dangerous. It is not because they are loud, boisterous, and carry guns-- though some do carry guns. It is because very often they use a wholesome motherhood image to manipulate others and get their way. I am getting ahead of myself, so let's look at the book. 

This book looks at the rise and powerful prominence of right wing Christian women in conservative politics in the United States. The book is arranged as follows: 

  • An introduction.
  • Six chapters. Each chapter covers one type of right wing conservative women: college women (mainly educated at Liberty University), Black conservative women, the "Mama Bears," the anti-feminist political powerhouses (who often, ironically perhaps, use feminist methods to get ahead without calling it that), the social media influencers, and the white suburbanites.
  • An epilogue, notes, and an index. 

The author has an "in" into these women's world because she was a right wing Christian conservative woman. This was her world, so she knows their ways and language. She also still has contacts in that sphere, which facilitated her research. Unlike other "guided safari" books seeking to explain American conservatives, this author as a guide once was one of the natives so to speak. She knows her way around and how to speak to the current folks in that sphere. 

A strength in the book is how well the author embeds herself in these women's world. She does interviews. She connects and networks. She attends rallies and events. She observes, and she listens. She also let's the women talk and tell their stories. The author may comment or make some observations, but for the most part she allows the women to speak for themselves and show you who they really are. If you are a liberal, here's your warning that a lot of what these women say and do may cause you to cringe: a lot of it may confirm the concern that often the female is really the most dangerous of the species. 

Many Americans think right wing Christian women are brainwashed, submissive, and silent in relation to their husbands. There may be one or two women like that, but overall this book should disavow readers of that idea. These women, each in their own way, can and do wield a lot of power and influence while wrapping themselves in domesticity, motherhood, often using feminine charms (for example, Fox News blondes, read the book for details), and wrapping themselves in the American flag. These are complex women who use various tools and abilities, within a very misogynistic political realm, to rise in power and continue their right wing religious conservative agenda. Does it sound contradictory at times or paradoxical? That is part of the deal. 

The book if anything reveals that while some women may be conservative due to family raising, for others it is a more active choice, often to preserve or gain some power and/or privilege. Thing is they do so while making the men believe they are going along in the submission, but in reality they got the control in their realms. 

Another strength of the book is that the author blends in history with current events. These women and their power politics did not just suddenly appear. These women are the successors of conservative Christian women who came before them. Some of those names, like Anita Bryant, you might recognize or recall, but others may be new to you. 

Another thing the book does, from the view of conservatives, is point out constant mistakes Democrats make and why Democrats often low key certain votes like the women vote. Now, Democrats can gripe all they want, but the observations are not wrong. Republicans wooing this women vote know women care for issues other than abortion and feminist theory, and they calibrate their message accordingly. To be honest, a lot of Democrat damage is self-inflicted, and they refuse to listen. 

The book is a relatively easy read. It is accessible and well documented. It pretty much read it a chapter at a time, and the narrative just moved along. 

Overall, I think this is a good solid read. We often hear of conservative men and Christian right wing men. The women are not just at the side of those men. As this book shows, they are often ahead of the men, even if the men don't quite realize it. Liberals and the Left really need to read this book and heed its lessons. One reason is that very often these women cannot find a place in the American Left, and the Right is more than happy to fill the void for them. 

 In the end, for some this may not be an easy read, but it is a necessary read. Recommended for public and academic libraries. Academic programs in political science, U.S. history and politics, religion, and women and gender studies may want this book. I'd order it for our library. 

 4 out of 5 stars. 

Additional reading notes:  

On the women who got Trump his second presidential term:  


"They pulled it off, I thought.  From the Mama Bears who prayed at state capitals for the past year, in driving rain, swirling snow, and blistering heat; the social media influencers who gathered millions of followers and praised Trump's commitment to make America healthy again; the White suburbanites, who warned their Bible study friends that immigrants were flooding the southern border and assaulting women and girls; the Black activists who traveled door-to-door in Alabama, explaining to other African Americans that Trump understood them, that he too faced an unfair, biased criminal justice system; the college women who convinced other students that Trump would recognize only two genders; and the powerhouses, who ran for office so they could carry out Trump's mandate on the local level, to ensure his second administration wouldn't be hindered by any obstacles" (2) 

As I often say, give the devil their due: they sure can organize and play the serious long game. This is an area where Democrats fail miserably, especially in recent times. Also note that when critics say Trump has a "woman problem," it mostly means left leaning liberal woman. As the above shows, he certainly did not have a "woman problem" with women in his base. As the author goes on to write, 

"...he made gains with almost every group of women, including  those who are Black, White, Latina, and Gen Z" (2). 

To be honest, in my humble opinion, if he had not done stupid stuff like starting an unnecessary war, he'd likely have kept the GOP in full lockstep instead of the party's current fragmentation. 

 

On the contradictions of right-wing women. I would add that those women suffer from some serious cognitive dissonance: 

"These results are even more puzzling when you consider that some of these voters disavow feminism yet borrow from feminist rhetoric and strategy to make their political claims. They praise intensive, stay-at-home motherhood, yet frequently prioritize their political careers over their kids. Many work to reform the country's public education system, yet send their own kids to private Christian schools (or homeschool them).  They are simultaneously disadvantaged by womanhood within their religious communities and deeply committed to advancing them" (3). 

By the way, the word "reform" above is doing a lot of charitable work given what these women really do regarding public education. While the author does not demonize these women, she certainly can be very sympathetic and charitable to them and their agendas. This is likely a reflection that she used to be one of them. 

 

How these women perceive themselves: 

"They perceive themselves to be maligned and misunderstood by the Left, like a minority faction under siege; they feel that their place in the country's social order is being dismantled" (7). 

Translation: their privilege is not what it used to be, and they're pissed about it. Plus the usual Christian persecution complex among right wingers. 

 

Christian conservative women over history: 

"Christian conservative moms campaigned against American intervention in World War II in the late thirties, protested busing policies in the fifties and sixties, fought against abortion in the seventies, porn in the eighties, and sex education in the nineties. Often these conservative women explicitly cited their role as mothers to claim a moral authority over their political concerns. Other times, it was just insinuated" (45). 

So basically they've been historically on the wrong side of just about every issue for decades. They justified it themselves by embracing the Christian mom label, and everyone else be damned.  

 

 Book qualifies for 2026 Netgalley/Edelweiss Reading Challenge. 


 

 

Wednesday, March 12, 2025

Book Review: White Poverty

William J. Barber (author) with Johnathan Wilson-Hartgrove, White Poverty: how exposing myths about race and class can reconstruct American Democracy. New York: Liveright Publishing (imprint of W.W. Norton), 2024.  ISBN: 9781324094876.

Genre: current affairs, social issues
Subgenre: US politics and society, poverty 
Format: hardback
Source: Hutchins Library, Berea College  

This is a book that will stay with me for a while. It was not an easy read for me, in part due to the 2024 U.S. presidential election results. Reverend Barber has way more charity than I do when it comes to folks that, many of them, sent the Pendejo In Chief back to DC. I hear once more the old saying, fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. So I did my best to put that aside in order to read this book. Having read the book I am not sure I can totally put that feeling aside, but I have a bit of clarity. I feel I understand a few things better, and it affirms something I believe strongly: if only we could unite against the oligarchs and robber barons, truly unite, we could truly change things. Therein though is the catch: getting people, especially the white poor, to see the struggles they have in common with other poor folks. 

Barber looks at the issue of poverty in the United States, focusing on white poverty. The U.S. as a whole tends to ignore or refuse to see white poverty. Heck, white poor people often refuse to see themselves as poor, and the politicians of both parties take full advantage of that attitude to push their agendas, agendas that certainly do not help those white poor folks, or no one else other than the oligarchs and robber barons. Barber, a Black minister, writes on white poverty because in the end poverty is poverty, and unlike politicians and racists, poverty does not care about the color of your skin nor any other demographic traits. 

In order to make his argument, Barber looks at four myths about poverty in the United States: 

  • Pale skin is a shared interest. 
  • Only Black folks want change in America.
  • Poverty is only a Black issue.
  • We can't overcome division. 

He then proceeds to discuss and dismantle those myths. The myths have been in the United States since the nation's birth, so it will take a lot of work to get people to see past them. The reverend puts in the work to break the myths apart using history, some Christian scripture (the man is a preacher), and many local stories and testimonies. The local stories and testimonies are a strength of the book. They are moving and powerful, and get the points across in practical terms. The good reverend often let's the poor folks speak for themselves. 

Barber has a lyrical and moving writing style that is also down to earth. You can't help but keep reading as he draws you in with warmth and kindness. I may not always agree with the man, but I kept on reading to see what he had to say and to learn more. 

In addition, the book also includes Wilson-Hartgrove's epilogue, which is a must-read, Barber's sermon for Biden's inauguration, and a notes section to document the statistics and facts presented in the book. 

As I often say and write, this is one of those books that more people, other than the choir, need to read. It certainly is timely reading in these Hard Times and for the work ahead. It offers important lessons. We just need to be willing to do the work and find what we have in common. 

I recommend the book for all libraries. In my humble opinion, this is a book that could be an option for the campus faculty book club. I will go a step further and say campus should invite the good reverend to speak at a convocation. Our students could get much benefit from such a convocation. Speaking of students, this book may be of interest locally for classes in General Studies, regional studies, ethnic studies, political science, and sociology. 

An essential read. It was worth it breaking my politics/activist stuff/social issues moratorium to read it. This book will likely go on my top list of nonfiction read for 2025. 

5 out of 5 stars. 


Additional reading notes: 

Why the author wrote the book: 

"I've written this book to ask America to look at its poor-- all its poor-- in the face and acknowledge that those faces are overwhelmingly white" (ix). 


Defining poverty in the book: 

"When I talk about poverty in this book, I'm talking about every American who lives in the edge-- not because they choose to, but because of policy decisions we continue to make as a nation. It's critical to name that poverty isn't an isolated experience in America. It is everywhere. And while it disproportionately weighs on Black and brown people, this basic fact of American inequality remains hidden in plain sight: white people are by far the largest racial demographic among America's poor" (xii). 


The failure of American politicians in both parties to name or even acknowledge the problem: 

"Over the past half century, Republicans in public life have tended to blame the poor, repeating myths that suggest poor folks are not people facing a problem, but rather are themselves the problem. Democrats, on the other hand, have tried to avoid talking about poor people by developing euphemisms like 'those aspiring to the middle class.' Meanwhile, people who don't have enough to make ends meet aren't sure anyone sees them. Are they 'working class' if they make it to their low-wage job in the minivan that their whole family slept in last night? Does 'lower middle class' include them if they sleep in a bed that someone who works third shift use while they work the day shift at the local factory?" (10). 

On a side note, I said prior to the 2024 U.S. elections that Democrats were not listening, and that was going to cost them. I did not think at the time they would lose the election, but I figured they would at least sweat bullets. They failed to read the fucking room. At the very least those people wanted to be listened to, acknowledged, taken seriously. Democrats ignored them and thus made them easy picking for the GOP and its pandering. Not that the Republicans would do better by them-- they will not-- but for a brief moment they pretended to listen, to show some interest. I add to this the words of author Brian Keene, which I paraphrase from memory: never underestimate the power Americans feel in saying fuck you, even if they go down too. But in the end, as I often say, I am not a pundit nor play one on TV. 


This is just a good image and line: 

"From the hills of Appalachia to the streets of Ferguson, there is a tie that binds people of every race who get up in the morning and strive to hew a stone of hope out of the mountain of hardship that weighs on their backs" (29). 


The problem in United States politics (or one of the many problems): 

"The problem in American politics isn't that poor white people vote against their interests so much as it is that poor people don't have anyone to represent their interests" (76). 


What a seer actually is, at least in the time of prophets: 

"When the ancients called prophets 'seers,' they didn't mean that they have magical powers to look into a crystal ball and foretell the details of a future none of us can know. Instead they meant that seers can see the patterns of our shared life and know where our choices are leading us" (139). 

Not that I would declare myself a seer, but between training, education, observation, intuition, and doing my own Great Work, I can see patterns fairly well. As a cartomancer, it is not so much magic and telling the future (though I do have my magic); it is about making sense of the patterns you see and seeing them honestly. The signs are there to be seen if one is willing to see them and hear. But again, I am not a pundit nor play one on TV. 

A line to remember: 

"We can't work for justice in America without talking about race, but we do not need to make white people our enemy to challenge racism" (194). 

That seems so simple and yet so many people in the U.S. outright forget it or ignore it. 


A couple of books from the notes section for my TBR list: 

  • Sylvie Laurent, King and the Other America
  • Matthew Desmond, Poverty, by America. To be honest, I had this book on my TBR list as I got a review copy before my boycott of publishers and imprints that sued Internet Archive. So I could have read it, but figured I could skip it due to the boycott. However, my library did get a copy, so I can read it on the basis of having the review copy before the start date and also to review it for our library. We'll see.



Book qualifies for the following 2025 Reading Challenge: 



Friday, July 14, 2023

Book Review: Mengele: Unmasking the "Angel of Death"

David G. Marwell, Mengele: Unmasking the "Angel of Death." New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2020. ISBN: 9780393609530.

Genre: biography
Subgenre: World War II, Nazi, Germany, war crimes, fugitives
Format: hardcover
Source: Berea branch, Madison County (KY) Public Library

 

I picked this up out of curiosity. I wanted to learn more about the man who is one of the greatest incarnations of evil. He probably comes in second or third in many people's minds after Hitler when it comes to Nazi atrocities and crimes. The book's author was an investigator with the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations in the 1980s, at the time when Mengele's body was finally found in Brazil and eventually identified. This biography looks at Josef Mengele as a man, a monster, and a symbol of Nazi atrocities. The book also shows what happens when doctors and scientists act without regard to any ethical nor humane restrictions. Mengele definitely tossed aside the Hippocratic Oath. 

The book has 14 chapters arranged in four parts and an epilogue: 

  • Part One: Becoming Mengele. Here we see his early years up to his military career up to right before Auschwitz. 
  • Part Two: Auschwitz. This covers his time in the concentration camp until the end of the war and the start of his escape. 
  • Part Three: Flight: Here we learn about his escape and how he managed, with support, to evaded authorities seeking his capture. 
  • Part Four: Pursuit. This documents the various efforts, not always coordinated nor consistent, to capture Mengele. We also get to closure as his body is found, though closure did not come right away. Not everyone was willing to accept Mengele's death right away.
  • Epilogue. 

 The book is based on research, investigation, and primary sources from various archives. It also draws on Mengele's own writing including letters, diaries, and a fictionalized account of his life. He basically wrote an autobiography in the form of a novel. 

The book takes us from his early life to his eventual death and sort of afterlife. The narrative is mostly in chronological order. The book's pacing is average. This is not a fast paced book, and it can be a bit dry at times. The book can also get bogged down on some very technical details. For example, the author provides a large section explaining the science of twins as it was at the time and how Mengele and the Nazis saw it. The author argues that understanding the topic helps us better understand Mengele, but that part gets a bit too technical at times. It slows down the book's pace. There were a few other parts that were a bit technical as well. 

There are some interesting things too. For instance, we get a glimpse of German sciences, which for the time were very advanced. Sadly they were also inhumane and outright racist, yet back then they saw themselves as serious scientists. Mengele certainly wanted to be seen as a serious scientist by his peers. Furthermore, over time other Nazi scientists came to depend on Mengele during the war for samples and specimens from camp victims that he would send them for their research. They all saw themselves as serious researchers, and none of them had any regard for those they killed in the name of science, their science. 

Once Mengele flees, the narrative moves on to the pursuit. We learn that at times the authorities almost had him or got close, but then things like ignorance, incompetence, or just plain bad luck enabled Mengele to stay steps ahead. Let's be honest, at times he did not put that much effort to hide who he was. He also did have a lot of support along the way from some family, many sympathizers, and various governments' officials. 

Overall, the book is informative. It offers some lessons that should not be forgotten Yet it is not that engaging, and it can be slow reading at times. It is also a bit of a dry read that at times feels like an academic textbook. It works if you want to learn about Mengele. This is one to borrow. For me it was OK. 

2 out of 5 stars. 

* * * * * 

Additional reading notes: 

By the way, eugenics were very much popular in the early part of the 20th century, and not just in Germany. The United States was a hot bed for eugenics too. As the book tells us, one of the prominent supporters of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics, and Eugenics (KWI-A) was the American Rockefeller Foundation. 

 Some folks think of Mengele as a rogue scientist, but that is not the case. He was very much part of a scientific and academic community: 

"Given Mengele's ambition, his pursuit of his Habilitation, and his patronage from Verschuer, it is clear that he pursued his science not as some renegade propelled solely by evil and bizarre impulses but rather in a manner that his mentors and his peers could judge as meeting the highest standards. Historian Massin writes, 'Mengele is sometimes portrayed as the embodiment of the pseudoscientific SS physician, who in complete isolation carries out his abstruse experiments. In fact, Mengele was very tightly connected to the scientific community'" (115). 

It was not just him. What he did in Auschwitz, monstrous and terrifying as it was, was not an anomaly. It was part of the scientific establishment at the time. Mengele was very much a product of a system of thought and practice. Thus for many people: 

"It is easier to dismiss an individual monster than to recognize the monstrous that can emerge from otherwise respected and enshrined institutions" (116). 





Friday, May 29, 2020

Booknote: Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness

Peter Kuper, Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness. New York: W.W. Norton, 2020. ISBN: 9780393635645.

Genre: fiction
Subgenre: graphic novels, adaptation
Format: hardback
Source: Berea branch of the Madison County (KY) Public Library 

This is a graphic novel adaptation of Conrad's short novel. The volume includes a foreword by Maya Jasanoff that provides a bit of context on Conrad's novel and why the novel remains significant. The volume also includes an artist statement by Peter Kuper, who did this adaptation, where he discusses how he created the art and provides some insights on his craft.

The adaptation itself is very good. The art captures the spirit and setting well. It balances text and image well to tell the story. I read Conrad's novel years ago, and I admit I had parts I did not get. Reading this adaptation helped me understand the story and narrative better. It may be an easier read due to the graphic novel format, but the adaptation captures the complexities of the source material. For me, this adaptation does make the novel more accessible. For reluctant readers, this graphic novel can be a good option.

Overall, I really liked it.

4 out of 5 stars.

Friday, February 03, 2017

Booknote: Paper: Paging Through History

Mark Kurlansky, Paper: Paging Through History. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-393-23961-4.

Genre: nonfiction
Subgenre: history, microhistory, paper.
Format: hardcover
Source: Berea branch of the Madison County (KY) Public Library.


As  much  as I wanted to like Kurlansky's Paper, the book is just too slow of a read. I've tried to get through it for over two months, and just dragged myself through it. I checked it out, renewed it until it reached renewal limit, then checked it out again. It was a slow, dragging read.

While the topic is interesting, the narrative is just not engaging enough. It makes a good bedtime book if you need something to help you sleep. The book overall is very comprehensive, drawing  from various areas of history. It often shows that civilizations developed paper once they felt the strong need to record things. And despite concerns about its production, it will continue to survive at  least for now.

The book also features a timeline and a bibliography. As a librarian, I think I found the bibliography a lot more interesting than the book itself. In the end, as I said, I wanted to like it, but it was just not engaging at all. On a side note, Nicholas Basbanes, an author I  have enjoyed in the past, also has a book on the  history of paper: On Paper: The Everything of its Two-Thousand Year History. I may give that  one a try instead.

2 out of 5 stars.

Book qualifies for this 2017 Reading Challenge:




Friday, August 23, 2013

Book Review: The Reader's Book of Days

Tom Nissley and Joanna Neborsky, The Reader's Book of Days: True Tales from the Lives and Works of Writers for Every Day of the Year. New York: W.W. Norton, 2013.

The title is pretty accurate in describing what the book is about. This is a nice calendar compendium of trivia and facts about writers and readers. It picks up vital dates as well as various curious facts about writers and literature. You also get scandals, hoaxes, romances, rivalries, and other curious facts, events, and anecdotes about writers. The book is arranged as a daily calendar. For a book lover like me, this is a nice and entertaining book. I think people who enjoy reading about books and the reading life will probably enjoy this one. I will add that this would be a good book for libraries to order. It works not just as I described, as a book for readers who like to read about reading. It also works as a good reference and trivia book. As a librarian, I could use this book to add a nice quote here and there on our social media, or I could use it for ideas for book and author displays. The book offers various possibilities. This is a book meant to be browsed, not so much read cover to cover.

Overall, I'd give it a 4 out of 5 stars.

Disclosure note to keep The Man appeased: I was provided with an electronic e-galley of this book via Edelweiss