Showing posts with label Pegasus Books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pegasus Books. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2024

Book Review: Borgata

Louis Ferrante, Borgata: Rise of Empire: a History of the American Mafia. New York: Pegasus Books, 2024. ISBN: 9781639366019. 

Genre: crime, Mafia, Cosa Nostra
Subgenre: U.S. history
Format: hardcover
Source: Eastside Branch, Lexington (KY) Public Library


Louis Ferrante is a former Mafia associate. In prison, he did something constructive and got an education studying law, science, and history. He eventually became a writer, and now this former mobster turned historian is our guide to a history of the Mafia, also known as La Cosa Nostra, in the United States. This first book covers the time from the rise of the Mafia in Sicily to its migration to the United States to the late 1950s to 1960s in the United States. This book is the first volume in a planned trilogy.

The book is arranged as follows: 

  • Introduction.
  • Five major parts with 33 chapters.
  • An epilogue.
  • Acknowledgement, source notes, and a bibliography.

The publisher describes the book as "a riveting history of the mafia," and for the most part it is. It is a history book, so there are some passages that are like a history textbook with sequences of dates and events. There are some dry reading moments, but not many. The book all in all is mostly pretty interesting. For example, the author warns that the opening chapters on Sicily and the rise of the Mafia may not be as interesting as the rest of the book. I found those chapters very interesting. Sicily has been invaded many times, and Sicilians have learned to deal with it as well as adapt some of what those invaders brought in. The author gives a good historical overview and shows why and how the Mafia took root in Sicily. 

Once we get to the United States, the author takes us through the history. Start in New York? Not quite yet. The beginning is down in New Orleans, then he works his way up to New York City and other parts of the country. At that point we start seeing some of the famous folks we often hear about such as Luciano, Lansky, and Siegel along with others. We get into Prohibition, then World War II, and on to the middle of the 20th century. It is good reading. 

A strength of the book is in the author's observations and explanations. Often, he looks at a piece of Mafia lore and/or accepted history, and he dispels it or sets the record straight. He looks at the available evidence as a researcher does and gives us a more accurate view or a more likely scenario in one instance or another. The text does include some footnotes, and I do recommend reading them as they add plenty to the overall context. 

The book is well documented with plenty of notes plus a bibliography. I will be looking through the bibliography, as librarians often do, to find books to read and learn more. 

In the end, I really liked this book. It is well written, interesting for the most part, and accessible. The Mafia really is a key part of U.S. history, and the author tells the story very well. I will be looking for the next volume. 

I do recommend this for libraries, especially public libraries. True crime readers as well as Mafia readers and/or history readers may find this book interesting. Academic libraries with strong collections in popular culture, crime studies, and/or U.S. history may want to consider adding it to their collections. 

4 out of 5 stars. 

Additional reading notes: 

The Mafia was not always original; it did borrow and adapt from its environment, for example: 

"Whatever the mafia did not inherit directly from feudalism, they appropriated from the secret societies of Italy which were all around them in the nineteenth century" (28). 

 

On early discrimination of Italians, especially in the U.S. South: 

"In fact, next to Blacks, Italians were the most frequently lynched ethnic group across the South and were hated by the Ku Klux Klan only second to Blacks" (59). 

The author does include photo and newspaper racist cartoons of the time to illustrate the above point. 

 



This book qualifies for the following 2024 Reading Challenge: 



Friday, June 14, 2019

Book Review: Browsings

Michael Dirda, Browsings: a Year of Reading, Collecting, and Living With Books. New York: Pegasus Books, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-60598-844-3.

Genre: nonfiction
Subgenre: books about books, personal essays
Format: hardcover
Source: Berea branch of the Madison County (KY) Public Library 


The book is a collection of essays that Michael Dirda wrote for the online magazine The American Scholar from 2012 to 2013. The essays are mostly bookish and literary but you also find some more personal pieces and even a rant or two. Essays vary in length but are about four pages long on average. Dirda describes the essays in the book's introduction:

"These are, in fact, very much personal pieces, the meandering reflections of a literary sybarite. The essays themselves vary wildly in subject matter, and rarely stick closely to their stated titles" (x).

Some of the topics Dirda includes are:

  • Bookish pets
  • Books on books
  • Spring book sales
  • Dirty pictures (not what you think) 
  • In praise of small presses
For an academic (he does have a doctorate in comparative literature), he does have a nice, warm style of writing. You can sit with this book and your favorite beverage and just relax and read. Dirda is very well read, and it shows in the many connections he makes between his essay topics and books he has read. This is definitely a good book for bedtime reading given the essays are light and easy to read. In addition, if you are looking for new books to read, Dirda is always generous in recommending books to read.

Overall, I really liked this book, and I do recommend it.

4 out of 5 stars.

* * * * * 

Additional reading notes:

In the essay "Armchair Adventures," Dirda starts by asking the following:

"Why is it that I so seldom want to read what everyone else wants to read?"

He makes an essay out of answering that question. My answer is a bit more simple: I do not give a shit about most of what everyone else wants to read. As you can see, my answer is not going to get me any professional writing gigs anytime soon, but it is my honest answer. To further clarify, I'd say it's because I like trying out new things, often new to me things which may be a bit older. Plus I will admit that often I do not think highly of "what everyone else wants to read." For instance, if Oprah puts it on her list, for me that's a "don't bother with this book" sign. In the case of Oprah, after she enthusiastically endorsed A Million Little Pieces only to later force herself to retract that endorsement in order to save face when the author was revealed to be an outright liar, I tend to be very skeptical of hot shot people shaping "what everyone else wants to read." Overall, I know what I like to read, try out something new here or there, and I read what I want to read.

Some suggestions from Dirda's "Books on Books" essay. I am linking titles to WorldCat where a record is available:

By the way, "Black Friday" style madness is not just for places like Walmart and Best Buy. Some high end book sales can be just as bad with long lines before opening, camping out, and then rushing in. See his essay "Spring Book Sales." I guess book collectors can be just as tacky and chusma as everyone else.

Another answer to why not read what everyone else is reading:

"As readers grow older, their tastes often become more rarefied, more refined, more recherché. Certainly mine have. These days I gravitate increasingly to books no one has heard of, let along is interested in, books that are odd and quirky and usually out of print" (109). 

I do not necessarily go for the extremely obscure as Dirda does, but I do seek out the odd and quirky where I can. I am not a book collector in the strict sense of books as objects of value. I do have a lot of books, but they are books to read, not just to stare at on the shelf. In reviewing, I do try for books that are available, even if it means doing an interlibrary loan request. As much as possible, I want books that are accessible to the average person and not just some book collector. Having said that, if I find a nice old paperback used that turns out to be good, even if out of print now, I'll share about it in a review. 

Dirda waxes nostalgic about LPs and CDs while his kids want downloaded music. Personally, I am more on his side. I prefer CDs where I can for the simple reason I own the music I bought on that CD. If I want to rip the CD to make electronic copies to play on my phone, I still own the original. Plus, when it comes to LPs , and some early CDs: 


". . .it once came in a substantial box, with a full libretto in multiple languages. Sometimes there was even a score, as well as a booklet with an essay on the opera and its composer, pictures of the performers and conductor, brief biographies and discographies of everyone involved. The covers of the boxed set might even reproduce a painting, perhaps something by Fragonard or Watteau" "(119).

I remember many of my dad's old LPs included things like song lyrics, photos, and even an essay or two on the music and/or performers. Then there was the cover art. You got a bit of that on the first wave of CDs, but publishers soon began skimping on that. And no, not all of that makes it to the Internet in case any of you technophiles dare suggest doing an Internet search.

Then again, Dirda, like many serious literary types, can get seriously pedantic at times. He commented on a Consumer Reports magazine headline: "America's Worst Scams?" 


"Looking at it, I wondered if that shouldn't be 'America's Best Scams'? Really terrible scames wouldn't be particularly effective, would they?" (177).

To which I reacted: they are the "worst" scams for those who fall for them, you overthinking twit. Plus, honestly, you need to get out more if this is the sort of thing you think about often. 

From his essay "In Praise of Small Presses," to look up: 




On your personal library: 


"Books don't just furnish a room. A personal library is a reflection of who you are and who you want to be, of what you value and what you desire, of how much you know and  how much more you'd like to know" (233). 

Keep on reading: 


"None of us, of course, will ever read all the books we'd like, but we can still make a stab at it. Why deny yourself all that pleasure? So look around tonight or this weekend, see what catches your fancy on the bookshelf, at the library, or in the bookstore. Maybe try something a little unusual, a little different. And then don't stop. Do it again, with a new book or an old author the following week. Go on-- be bold, be insatiable, be restlessly, unashamedly promiscuous" (234). 



Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Booknote: Tastes Like Chicken

Emelyn Rude, Tastes Like Chicken: a History of America's Favorite Bird. New York: Pegasus Books, 2016. ISBN: 9781681771632.

Genre: nonfiction
Subgenre: chickens, poultry, history, foodie
Format: e-book galley
Source: NetGalley

I tend to like microhistories, so I thought this book would be a good selection. The book looks at the chicken from domestication ten thousand years ago or so to today's popularity. It was not always the case that chicken was popular. For instance, in America's colonial days, chickens were not  seen as valuable, and farmers rarely bothered to pen them in.

The book is well researched, but it is a slogging and slow read, especially the early chapters where the author basically drowns the reader in minutiae. If you are expecting an interesting narrative with an engaging reading pace, then this book is not for you. I barely managed to finish it in order to write this short review.

If I have to recommend the book, I'd do so for academic libraries where the school has a strong culinary sciences program or maybe strength in food history and/or agricultural sciences. For my library, I would only order this if it was requested. This is not a book for popular readers. The description of the book says this is in the spirit of Mark Kurlansky's Cod. I'd say skip this book and go read one of Kurlansky's books instead.

1 out of 5 stars.

This book qualifies for the following 2016 Reading Challenges: