Friday, June 05, 2026

Book Review: Tarot and the Psychology of the Soul

Mariana Louis, Tarot and the Psychology of the Soul: Exploring the Archetypal Mirrors of the Psyche. Newburyport, MA: Weiser Books, 2026. 9781578638787. 

Genre: Tarot
Subgenre: psychology, Jungian
Format: e-book galley
Source: Edelweiss Plus  

Book cover for Tarot and Psychology of the Soul. Title letters over a red ornate background
Recently finished this book, and if you are looking to do a deep dive into Tarot, this book is a good option. As I've written before, Tarot book authors usually have a method, lesson, plan, etc. to teach. This author's method is depth psychology and Jungian psychology. It explores the archetypes of Tarot in depth, and it provides material, exercises, and questions to aid your learning.

The book is organized in four parts with 13 chapters. Topics covered include archetypal methods and techniques, the Minor Arcana, the Major Arcana, and three Tarot spreads at the end of the book. 

The book as a whole is interesting, and the author does a pretty good job of explaining concepts. However, the text can still be a bit dense, so this may or not be a good book for beginners. I might not give this book to a beginner as their first Tarot book. However, if they've already read two or three beginner books, this book can be the next step up for beginners. For intermediate and advanced practitioners this book can be a good option. 

If your knowledge of depth psychology is limited, the author uses the first two chapters to explain the basics and give readers and overview. Author then starts with the Minor Arcana card by card, showing how the concepts of depth psychology apply and archetypes present. 

For each pip card we get a short essay on each card. We get upright and reversed meanings that draw strongly on archetypes and depth psychology. This may add a bit more insight or ideas to consider in your readings. Still,  if you read within Rider Waite Smith (RWS) tradition, there is enough material you will recognize. 

Major Arcana entries are similar; author divides them into four groups of archetypes: masculine and feminine, developing ego, encountering the shadow-- archetypes of descent, and approaching wholeness-- archetypes of transcendence. In this sequence, author places the Fool-0 at the end after the World-XXI. Some may or not agree with the placement, but I believe it deserves some consideration. 

 The author provides a card reading ritual later in the book. I thought it was very nice, but it is fairly complex. It may be a bit much for those of us who do a short daily ritual to reflect and get in touch with the Divine, or the Cosmic Joker in my case. Save this one for when you have some serious time to practice your cartomancy, and most likely for a private personal reading. 

The same applies to the three card spreads offered in the book. They are fairly complex, so good for in-depth work and reflection. They may be useful too for some shadow work. 

The book includes a bibliography. This can be helpful for further reading and research. Many of the works listed are by Jung or about Jung or related to Jung. For me, I may need to read a bit more by and about Jung works if for no other reason than to expand my learning and knowledge. Having said that, there are some works in the bibliography I have read that I may want to revisit. I may gain additional appreciation for this book if I revisit some of those books. 

Overall this is a solid and substantial book on Tarot. I read through it to review it, but it is one to revisit and reread. It lends itself well to studying individual Tarot cards and for inner work.

I do recommend it for libraries that collect esoteric materials. It is a book that I would buy a print copy for my personal collection. 

5 out of 5 stars. 

Additional reading notes: 

According the author, the only question we bring to the cards: 

"In my years of tarot teaching and counseling, I have come to learn that the only question we bring to the cards is the one I asked on that summertime evening: how am I meant to live? While the lure to glimpse what the future holds is undeniable, we don't really want to know what's going to happen as much as we want to know what promise we hold and how to meet it" (3). 

This reminds me a bit of doing reference interviews when a patron asks a question but that may not be the question they really want, and it falls to a librarian like me to help them express the real question and then find the answer. By the way, this is not first time cartomancy has reminded me of this process. I may need to think about it and write a bit more about it down the road. 

 

An author observation and warning: 

"There is a tendency in our contemporary world to self-pathologize and self-therapize, which can be misguided and even psychologically dangerous" (9). 

That is a statement that is bound to piss off a few people on social media, including the anti-psychology crowd, but it is fair to say not every is nor needs to be a diagnosis. However, 

"If we are thoughtful and conscientious about our approach, however, we can use these depth psychology principles to support and guide our own intuitive and therapeutic self-inquiry" (9). 

 

The author defines divining: 

"The act of divining is not so much seeing what has not yet come to pass as it is peering into the unknown with god-blessed vision, uncovering what is hidden or obscure from mortal sight" (10). 

The author argues that rather than divination Tarot is or should be a tool of individuation. A bit on what it is: 

"In the work of individuation we are become who we most authentically are; we are becoming whole. It is the effort of embracing our extraordinary multiplicity and complexity, accepting and appreciating it all profoundly, and integrating it into a unified, centered experience of selfhood" (11). 

 

Aim of the book: 

The aim of this book is to act as a guide into greater self-knowledge via the cards, not as a manual for how the cards can fix your life nor as a quick dose of someone else's interpretive wisdom to stand in for your own. Its true purpose is to guide you both toward a deeper relationship with the tarot and toward a deeper relationship with yourself" (14). 

 

On journaling. I always take it as a good sign when an author encourages journaling: 

"You may also want to start a tarot journal in which you record your reflections. You might begin your entries by referencing a guidebook or jotting down some meanings, but the purpose of a tarot journal is to process and record your personal, intuitive reactions. Engaging the card at this level will automatically encourage greater intimacy with it" (37). 

 

Some books from the bibliography I'd like to read: 

 

   

Book qualifies for the following 2026 Reading Challenge: 

Netgalley and Edelweiss Reading Challenge 2026

 

 

Wednesday, June 03, 2026

The top new-to-me authors I read in 2025

Again, this is another prompt I took noytes in the notebook then forgot to come back and post it here on the blog. So here we go, via That Artsy Reader Girl, my top new-to-me authors I read in 2025. Book links go to my reviews on this blog: 

 

Charlie Claire Burgess, Radical Tarot.


 

 

William J. Barber, II, White Poverty.


 

 

Cory Doctorow, The Internet Con.


 

 

Garry J. Shaw, Cryptic.


 

 

 

Chuck Collins, Burned by Billionaires.



 

 

Courtney Weber, Hekate: Goddess of Witches


 

 

 

 

 

Monday, June 01, 2026

Media notes: Roundup for May 2026

 

 

  

 

Welcome to my somewhat random selection of the movies and series on DVD and/or online I watched during May 2026.


Movies and films (links to themoviedb.org or Wikipedia for basic information unless noted otherwise). Some of these I watched via TubiTv.com or other online source. The DVDs come from the public library (unless noted otherwise). In addition, I will try to add other trivia notes, such as when a film is based on a book adding the information about the book (at least the WorldCat record if available). 

  • Don't Breathe (2016. Horror. Thriller.Crime). Plot description: "A group of teens break into a blind man's home thinking they'll get away with the perfect crime. They're wrong."  I had not heard of this one before until Tubi showed it as a suggestion to watch. The trailer looked good enough. It's one of those in the genre of badass guy minding his own business when outsiders decide to mess with him for some reason, and hell then breaks loose for them. The small gang has specific rules: they mostly steal small valuables, no cash, to avoid charges of grand larceny if they get caught. However, the rumor the blind man has a large amount of money in the house, due to a legal settlement he got, is too much of a temptation for them. We get a bit of background on the thieves, very little, as they plan the heist, but let's be honest; these are not people deserving of sympathy given their crimes. An interesting detail, to me at least, is some of the ways the Blind Man knows or can tell there are people in his home whether from hearing or a good sense of smell. This was an unexpected thriller for me. Good amount of suspense and tension throughout. Plus, just when you think things can't get worse, we get a twist at the middle of the film revealing how far the Blind Man will go. Good performances from Stephen Lang as the Blind Man and Jane Levy as Rocky. The pace moves well, and it keeps going. The ending act may feel a bit drawn, but it still works well. This film keeps you at the edge of the seat, and while I am not sympathetic to the thieves, you do end up wondering if any of them will make it or not. This is pretty good, and I would recommend it. I understand there is a sequel, and I may try to find it. 4 out of 5 stars. Watched 5/2. 
  • 2018 (Thriller. Action. Adventure. Indian film. Also known as 2018: Everyone is a hero). Plot description: "A disaster film set during the 2018 Kerala Floods where people from all walks of life faced catastrophic consequences and put in collective efforts to survive the calamity." Watched via TubiTv, which had the film dubbed in Spanish. I did not realize that until I started watching the film. Not an issue for me, though I admit I have not watched a Spanish dub in a while. Film starts introducing the various characters in the story, folks from various walks of life. Soon it starts raining, but initially it is just the usual rain, so life goes on. Until the rain continues, a new low pressure front moves in, and disaster comes with an unprecedented storm. Once the disaster is apparent, the people start rallying to help each other. Overall, a good drama, though the film can feel a bit long at times; it has a 2-hour and 28 minutes run time. Some moving moments, including the ending. We mostly follow the various small stories as people come together in the face of the floods. 3 out of 5 stars. Watched 5/10.
    • Basis of the film was the 2018 Kerala Floods. Note from the looks of it, flooding in the area seems to happen often, but this year was particularly bad.
  • The Moon (2023. Science Fiction. Drama. Disaster film. South Korean. Alternate title: Deu Mun). Plot description: "One astronaut, Sun-woo is left stranded in space. Facing another fatal catastrophe, the Naro Space Center turns to its former managing director Kim Jae-guk to help bring Sun-woo back home safely."  Tubi recommended this one as similar to something else I watched, but I can't recall similar to what now. Anyhow, sounds pretty good so took a chance on it. I've been happy with many of the Asian films I've been finding and watching on Tubi. The movie is a pretty good drama, though the tension of the United States refusing to help, comes across as just mean. Not just mean but outright mean and petty (though for the U.S. not surprising). Then there is the tension between Kim and the current director, who seems a bit more worried about his ego than doing the right thing and looking good for his superiors. Meanwhile, as for the mission, just when you think Sun-woo can get a break, something else worse happens. This is a reason the movie feels long; the writers kept adding obstacle after obstacle, but it does keep the tension of the film going strong. The suspense is quite good as we all wonder will they manage to get Sun-woo back home. And if that is not enough, there is a twist or two revealed. Overall, a solid thriller that keeps you on the edge to the very end. 4.5 out of 5 stars. Watched 5/16.
  • Dracula 3000 (2004. Horror. Vampires. Science Fiction). Plot description: "On a routine mission, a salvage ship discovers a transporter vessel that vanished a century ago, unveiling a mystery far greater than they imagined." The movie is OK. A bit of Dracula retelling with a small touch of Alien,  but without the horror. This had potential, but it failed to capitalize on it. So we get a cheesy, somewhat slow science fiction film that is barely a thriller. The ending was also a bit abrupt. In the end, it was OK, so 2 out of 5 stars barely. Via TubiTv. Watched 5/24. 
    • To leave no doubt this is a Dracula film, there are nods and details back to the original book. The transporter ship is the Demeter, and its Captain is named Abraham Van Helsing. The intern is named Mina, and of course Count Orlock is Dracula.  The system the ship is lost in is the Carpathian system.
    • The captain of the Demeter, long dead by time the salvage ship finds them, left recordings that we see every so often in the film. This kind of goes back to the letters we get in the novel.  
 


Television and other series (basic show information links via Wikipedia unless noted otherwise). Some of these come in DVD from the public library. Others may be via YouTube, which, as noted before, I keep finding all sorts of other old shows in it, often full episodes:

  • Gordon Ramsay's Secret Service (2025. Reality. Restaurants. Cooking). Plot description: Since often when Ramsay visits, restaurants try to clean themselves up before he gets there, this time he infiltrates restaurants with help of an insider to see what really happens. He enters a place after hours, sees the real messes, then later returns to help them. The insider's identity is not revealed until the end of each episode. This is a short show of only one season with 14 episodes, so I took a chance. If you like other shows where a celebrity expert goes in to fix a business, or you have seen other Ramsay shows, you may like this one. This one is OK. Fairly fast paced, though it takes days in the reality to fix a place. Some drama, as you expect in this kind of show, not as much as other Ramsay shows like say Hell's Kitchen. I thought the nicest episode was the one for the Eritrean restaurant and its very sweet matriarch owner. Overall not a big deal but entertaining enough. 
    • A bit of the fun in watching the show is trying to guess who the insider is before an episode ends.  
    • Also a small fun detail is to see what fake business name they give Ramsay's surveillance truck every week.
  •  Gordon Ramsay's 24 Hours to Hell and Back (2018-2020. Reality. Restaurants. Cooking). Plot description: The premise here is Ramsay will attempt to fix a restaurant and get it back on track in 24 hours. To do so, his team and him travel in a giant truck that serves as command center and mobile training kitchen. Before fixing the place, he visits it undercover, wearing a disguise, often with guests, to assess the place. If you liked shows like his Secret Service (see above) or maybe Kitchen Nightmares (I tend to prefer his original British show, but 24 Hours is closer in style to the American version of Kitchen Nightmares), you may like this one. I saw Tubi had it, read a bit about it, took a chance and started it at the end of the month. It has three seasons, and I finished the first season, then about halfway into the second season by end of May. 
  • Kojak (1973-1978. Action. Crime. Drama).  The classic police drama procedural with Telly Savalas in the title role as Lieutenant Detective Theophilus "Theo" Kojak. I continue this month starting with Season 5, episode 3. TubiTv lost the series at the end of April, but I managed to find that the Roku Channel had it on their stream, so I finished the series over on Roku in May. Overall, it is very much a 1970s series, but the stories are good for the most part, and many of the themes still hold up well. 
    • Again, in actors you have seen elsewhere, Armand Assante appears in season 5, episode 6.  
    • In season 5, episode 16, Shelley Winters is the guest star as a not so good con woman who happens to be sister in law to Captain McNeil.  
    • In episode 19 of season 5 we see Jeff Conaway. Some of us know him later as security chief Zack Allen in Babylon 5. 

 


Friday, May 29, 2026

Book Review: Darth Vader-- Legacy's End

Charles Soule, et.al., Star Wars. Darth Vader, dark lord of the Sith, Volume 2: Legacy's End. New York: Marvel, 2018.  ISBN: 9781302907457.

Genre: Star Wars, science fiction
Subgenre: Darth Vader series
Format: trade paperback
Source: Eastside Branch, Lexington (KY) Public Library  
 

This is part of Charles Soule's run on the Darth Vader comics. This volume features two stories. 

The main story is Vader's hunt for Jocasta Nu. Jocasta was the Jedi librarian, and while she is barely a fighter, her knowledge of the Jedi and their library makes her valuable and a threat to the Empire. She strives to stay ahead as she works urgently to preserve what she can of Jedi knowledge. 

The second story has a couple of mercenaries who have a contract to kill Vader. Who would dare we might ask? When Vader discovers the contract may have come from Coruscant, the imperial capital, things may get complicated.  

I liked the stories, but there was a moment or two I honestly questioned a character or two. At one point, Jocasta has to break into the Jedi temple for some information. She is doing well, about to get away with it, when she notices one of Vader's inquisitors reading some books. Instead of just ignoring it and moving on, she decides to be upset and confront the guy pawing her books. Lady, you had one job to do. They guy was totally unaware of your presence, and instead you decide to play pissy librarian. Needless to say the story goes downhill for her from there. It's not often I get annoyed at characters doing stupid shit, but this was some really stupid shit. 

The second story was good enough, with just enough action and intrigue to keep you reading. 

Overall, I liked the volume. It was a nice and light read, and I read it pretty fast. Would've liked to see more of the librarian, but that did not last. We get a couple of stories that keep the series going, but nothing terribly memorable. This is one to read and move on. 

3 out of 5 stars. 

Qualifies for the following 2026 Reading Challenge: 


 

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

In 2025, my year in books tag

I saw this prompt over at Witty and Sarcastic Bookclub, and I wrote notes for it in my notebook. I then, as life often happens, forgot to post it on the blog here. I recently was looking through my writing notebook and found it, so I decided to go ahead and post it now. I suppose late is better than never. Prompts are as provided; the books are ones I read last year. Links go to my reviews of the books. 

 

If you did this tag and posted it, feel free to share a link with me, and I will go over and check it out. I am always curious what other people are reading out there. Or if you got any comments, feel free to write them down below.