Friday, July 24, 2026

Book review: Esther's Army

Katie Gaddini, Esther's Army: the Christian women who power the American right. New York: W.W. Norton, 2026.

Genre: politics, women
Subgenre: U.S. politics, American history
Format: e-book galley
Source: Edelweiss Plus  

 

Let's start with a brief description of the book, from the publisher: 

"How and why right-wing Christian women have risen to the forefront of American politics."  

I read this book in part because I am a believer in knowing my enemy, and right wingers who seek take away my rights and those of others in my circle certainly are an enemy. Within that bunch, right wing conservative women are seriously dangerous. It is not because they are loud, boisterous, and carry guns-- though some do carry guns. It is because very often they use a wholesome motherhood image to manipulate others and get their way. I am getting ahead of myself, so let's look at the book. 

This book looks at the rise and powerful prominence of right wing Christian women in conservative politics in the United States. The book is arranged as follows: 

  • An introduction.
  • Six chapters. Each chapter covers one type of right wing conservative women: college women (mainly educated at Liberty University), Black conservative women, the "Mama Bears," the anti-feminist political powerhouses (who often, ironically perhaps, use feminist methods to get ahead without calling it that), the social media influencers, and the white suburbanites.
  • An epilogue, notes, and an index. 

The author has an "in" into these women's world because she was a right wing Christian conservative woman. This was her world, so she knows their ways and language. She also still has contacts in that sphere, which facilitated her research. Unlike other "guided safari" books seeking to explain American conservatives, this author as a guide once was one of the natives so to speak. She knows her way around and how to speak to the current folks in that sphere. 

A strength in the book is how well the author embeds herself in these women's world. She does interviews. She connects and networks. She attends rallies and events. She observes, and she listens. She also let's the women talk and tell their stories. The author may comment or make some observations, but for the most part she allows the women to speak for themselves and show you who they really are. If you are a liberal, here's your warning that a lot of what these women say and do may cause you to cringe: a lot of it may confirm the concern that often the female is really the most dangerous of the species. 

Many Americans think right wing Christian women are brainwashed, submissive, and silent in relation to their husbands. There may be one or two women like that, but overall this book should disavow readers of that idea. These women, each in their own way, can and do wield a lot of power and influence while wrapping themselves in domesticity, motherhood, often using feminine charms (for example, Fox News blondes, read the book for details), and wrapping themselves in the American flag. These are complex women who use various tools and abilities, within a very misogynistic political realm, to rise in power and continue their right wing religious conservative agenda. Does it sound contradictory at times or paradoxical? That is part of the deal. 

The book if anything reveals that while some women may be conservative due to family raising, for others it is a more active choice, often to preserve or gain some power and/or privilege. Thing is they do so while making the men believe they are going along in the submission, but in reality they got the control in their realms. 

Another strength of the book is that the author blends in history with current events. These women and their power politics did not just suddenly appear. These women are the successors of conservative Christian women who came before them. Some of those names, like Anita Bryant, you might recognize or recall, but others may be new to you. 

Another thing the book does, from the view of conservatives, is point out constant mistakes Democrats make and why Democrats often low key certain votes like the women vote. Now, Democrats can gripe all they want, but the observations are not wrong. Republicans wooing this women vote know women care for issues other than abortion and feminist theory, and they calibrate their message accordingly. To be honest, a lot of Democrat damage is self-inflicted, and they refuse to listen. 

The book is a relatively easy read. It is accessible and well documented. It pretty much read it a chapter at a time, and the narrative just moved along. 

Overall, I think this is a good solid read. We often hear of conservative men and Christian right wing men. The women are not just at the side of those men. As this book shows, they are often ahead of the men, even if the men don't quite realize it. Liberals and the Left really need to read this book and heed its lessons. One reason is that very often these women cannot find a place in the American Left, and the Right is more than happy to fill the void for them. 

 In the end, for some this may not be an easy read, but it is a necessary read. Recommended for public and academic libraries. Academic programs in political science, U.S. history and politics, religion, and women and gender studies may want this book. I'd order it for our library. 

 4 out of 5 stars. 

Additional reading notes:  

On the women who got Trump his second presidential term:  


"They pulled it off, I thought.  From the Mama Bears who prayed at state capitals for the past year, in driving rain, swirling snow, and blistering heat; the social media influencers who gathered millions of followers and praised Trump's commitment to make America healthy again; the White suburbanites, who warned their Bible study friends that immigrants were flooding the southern border and assaulting women and girls; the Black activists who traveled door-to-door in Alabama, explaining to other African Americans that Trump understood them, that he too faced an unfair, biased criminal justice system; the college women who convinced other students that Trump would recognize only two genders; and the powerhouses, who ran for office so they could carry out Trump's mandate on the local level, to ensure his second administration wouldn't be hindered by any obstacles" (2) 

As I often say, give the devil their due: they sure can organize and play the serious long game. This is an area where Democrats fail miserably, especially in recent times. Also note that when critics say Trump has a "woman problem," it mostly means left leaning liberal woman. As the above shows, he certainly did not have a "woman problem" with women in his base. As the author goes on to write, 

"...he made gains with almost every group of women, including  those who are Black, White, Latina, and Gen Z" (2). 

To be honest, in my humble opinion, if he had not done stupid stuff like starting an unnecessary war, he'd likely have kept the GOP in full lockstep instead of the party's current fragmentation. 

 

On the contradictions of right-wing women. I would add that those women suffer from some serious cognitive dissonance: 

"These results are even more puzzling when you consider that some of these voters disavow feminism yet borrow from feminist rhetoric and strategy to make their political claims. They praise intensive, stay-at-home motherhood, yet frequently prioritize their political careers over their kids. Many work to reform the country's public education system, yet send their own kids to private Christian schools (or homeschool them).  They are simultaneously disadvantaged by womanhood within their religious communities and deeply committed to advancing them" (3). 

By the way, the word "reform" above is doing a lot of charitable work given what these women really do regarding public education. While the author does not demonize these women, she certainly can be very sympathetic and charitable to them and their agendas. This is likely a reflection that she used to be one of them. 

 

How these women perceive themselves: 

"They perceive themselves to be maligned and misunderstood by the Left, like a minority faction under siege; they feel that their place in the country's social order is being dismantled" (7). 

Translation: their privilege is not what it used to be, and they're pissed about it. Plus the usual Christian persecution complex among right wingers. 

 

Christian conservative women over history: 

"Christian conservative moms campaigned against American intervention in World War II in the late thirties, protested busing policies in the fifties and sixties, fought against abortion in the seventies, porn in the eighties, and sex education in the nineties. Often these conservative women explicitly cited their role as mothers to claim a moral authority over their political concerns. Other times, it was just insinuated" (45). 

So basically they've been historically on the wrong side of just about every issue for decades. They justified it themselves by embracing the Christian mom label, and everyone else be damned.  

 

 Book qualifies for 2026 Netgalley/Edelweiss Reading Challenge. 


 

 

Friday, July 17, 2026

Deck Review: Golden Masquerade Tarot

Golden Masquerade Tarot.  Florida: Craft Cards Store. (No ISBN on item; link to publisher. You can also find their decks on Amazon).

Genre: Tarot, cartomancy
Subgenre: carnival, masquerade, independent deck
Format: kit with small book and deck
Source: I own this one  

A person wearing white robes and mask, holds two swords crossed in front of them
Two of Swords
I first used this deck in March 2026. This is one of those decks I found by serendipity. In other words, I was looking for something else online, and this came as a suggestion. For a devotee of the Cosmic Joker like me, a deck with a carnival and masquerade theme made sense. So between that and a reasonable to me price for an indie deck I decided to get it. 

Let me get an issue out of the way. A reviewer or two on Amazon have speculated this deck may be AI art. The company neither confirms nor denies, and take an Amazon review for what it may be worth. If the speculation had been confirmed I might have avoided it, but it looked nice enough, and I did not hear about the issue until I got it and used it. This is one where I will let readers decide about the deck. I am reviewing it as I used it. 

The kit comes with a small paperback companion book and the 78-card deck. The book has 96 pages, and it is very basic. It is arranged as follows: 

  • How to use the cards. Brief advice on how to use and read the cards. 
  • Traditional full Tarot deck. Just a very brief description of a Tarot deck's structure.
  • Reversed card position interpretation. A small list of ways to interpret reversals if you choose to use them. 
  • Card entries. We get the Major Arcana entries followed by Minor Arcana entries by suit: wands, cups, swords, and pentacles. All entries have same content: a paragraph of upright interpretations and another paragraph for reversed interpretations. 

The book is very basic. Card entries offer basic interpretations and nothing more. No symbols, card descriptions, nor any other additional details are offered. No illustrations are included. It is as plain as they come, but it does the job if you need some guidance. Can you read the cards without the book? Yes, most likely. I read it anyhow, and I can say it can be optional. 

The cards look quite nice, and if you like the carnival and masquerade theme, you might like this deck too. The art is colorful, yet a bit muted; it is not bright art. The faces show a range of emotions. Most faces will have a mask somehow, which can include face painting. IN the end, the deck worked well for me. 

A person wearing an eye mask, white face paint on rest of face. Ornate dress. Holds a shining orb hovering over their hands.
The Magician-I

The card art falls within Rider Waite Smith (RWS) tradition, but there are some cards that do a bit of their own thing. Given the detailed art, which is a bit playful, I'd say it can work for intuitive readers. 

The deck worked for me when I was using it. It it is a decent reader for me. Would I use it again? Yes, I would use it again down the road. This is a deck you could use year round. Not sure yet if I can use it with other decks such as oracle decks, though as I think about it now, a deck like the Divine Circus Oracle could work with this one. I may need to work with the deck a bit more to see what other decks I could use in combination. 

The cards measure about 4 3/4 inches by 2 3/4 inches. The card stock is a bit on the thick side. The thick card stock does feel durable. The art has a soft matte finish, and the cards shuffle with relative ease. The card art is borderless. The deck features a golden gilding. Art on the card back is reversible. 

4 out of 5 stars.  

Friday, July 10, 2026

Deck Review: Whispers of Time Tarot

Sonya Kulynyak, Whispers of Time Tarot. Torino, Italy: Lo Scarabeo, 2025. ISBN: 9780738781594.  Distributed in the U.S. by Llewellyn Worldwide (link to Llewellyn).

Genre: Tarot decks
Subgenre: classical art, mysticism 
Format: 78-card deck and small companion book in box
Source: I own this one  

The Hierophant-V 

So far this may be one of the most beautiful decks I've used in 2026. The kit includes the 78-card deck and a small companion book. It is published by Lo Scarabeo, so the book's text is in multiple languages: English, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese. The book has 178 pages; the English text has 65 pages. The small book is arranged as follows: 

  • Introduction. Where the author briefly explains the deck's concept and provides a bit of advice on reading the cards. 
  • The Spreads. We get three card spreads you can try out. 
  • The Cards. Here are the card entries. Card entries include a short list of keywords and the interpretation text. The Minor Arcana entries also include a keywords list, but the interpretation text is a bit shorter than the text in the Major Arcana entries. 

All in all the interpretations are good in describing the card symbols and providing meanings. Interpretations fall well within Rider Waite Smith (RWS) system. Book is accessible and easy to read. For beginners it provides what is needed. If you are experienced, can you read the cards without the book? Yes. If you read in RWS tradition, you could skip the book. I read it, and I still suggest others read it just to see what insights the author provides. 

The deck features art in a classical style that evokes mysticism with a bit of magic and daily life. Art has a realistic style. It is colorful and expressive. Faces convey emotions very well. Art also makes use of shadowing very well. Given how expressive it is and its attention to detail, I'd say the deck can work well intuitive readers. 

Eight of Pentacles
I enjoy this deck for its classical art style. It feels traditional, and it is a deck you can use to read for yourself and others. The art feels like it could be found in a museum. It's art that invites you to look deeply and meditate on what you see. It could also be a good option for shadow work. 

The cards measure about 4 3/4 inches by 2 3/4 inches. Card stock is a bit on the thick side, so it feels durable. The finish is a soft matte, so the deck can be shuffled easily. A nice touch is the golden gilded edging. 

Overall, I love this deck. I found it to be a reliable reader, responsive, easy to use. It also just looks good when you lay them out. I was reluctant to put it away when I did my monthly deck rotation, so I know I will be reaching for it again soon. This is one I would be happy to get a back up copy. It can also be a good gift, especially for folks who enjoy classical art styles. I am very happy to have it in my collection. 

 

5 out of 5 stars.  

Saturday, July 04, 2026

Media Notes: Roundup for June 2026

 

  

 

Welcome to my somewhat random selection of the movies and series on DVD and/or online I watched during June 2026.


Movies and films (links to themoviedb.org for basic information unless noted otherwise). Some of these I watched via TubiTv.com or other online source. The DVDs come from the public library (unless noted otherwise). In addition, I will try to add other trivia notes, such as when a film is based on a book adding the information about the book (at least the WorldCat record if available).

  • Sector 7 (2011. Horror. Science Fiction. Action. Korean film). Plot description: "An oil rig crew working off the southern tip of Jeju Island is suddenly forced to battle a deadly creature it finds 2,500 meters deep under the sea." Movie starts a bit slow, mostly a way for us to get to know the crew. When one of the female workers die, they suspect a guy who may have had a crush on her. However, when the rig's doctor dies shortly after, soon clues emerge it may be more than just a crime of passion. There is something aboard with them, and not only that, but we soon find out someone was messing with nature when they should not have. That last detail makes a twist on what is otherwise a horror film like Alien, but in an oil rig. Overall, movie is good enough. Some thrills, but nothing terribly memorable. The ending seemed to stretch a bit more than needed, but it was OK. Other than Hae-Jun, the main character, other characters are not really memorable, mostly there for the monster to pick them off. I'd give this two out of five stars as it was just OK. Not bad, but not that good either. Watched via TubiTv on 6/6.
  • Cadaver (2007. Horror. Korean film). Plot description: "Six med students dissect a beautiful cadaver. Now a vengeful spirit is dissecting them one by one. They must solve her murder to survive the class."  Movie starts slow in the build up. Initially the students see things, but we can't quite be sure if it is something supernatural, or just the natural nerves, squeamish feelings, and anxieties medical students may have dissecting their first cadaver. Soon things get more tense as another student dies, others start having dreams and seeing visions as the students start realizing the truth of the vengeful spirit. As we go into the backstory of the dead woman, we learn a somewhat complicated story, and one that one of the professors would rather stay hidden. Because it is not just about a dead girl, but there is also a conspiracy to hide. The film is more thriller than horror, and it is seriously slow at times. It is also almost 2 hours long, and you can feel the drag. On a positive some of the handling of flashbacks is well done. Still, the film feels a bit on the long side. Part of it is it feels they are not sure if to lean in on the supernatural or the conspiracy angle, so at times it feels like they just threw everything in and then some more. The deeper you go, the more you want the movie to just end. The premise on this one is good, and it starts well, but then it just keeps going and going. It is barely OK, but I am still willing to give it 2 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 6/7.
  • One on One (2014. Crime. Drama. Korean film). Plot description:  "After the senseless and grisly murder of a high school girl, her seven well-to-do assailants are hunted down and tortured by seven vigilantes." Part of what makes the film interesting is that the vigilantes, who are not exactly pros,  are not all united. They have disagreements at times about what they are doing, so you wonder if they will be able to go through with their task. Also, they have different motivations for joining the vigilante group. However, plot gets complicated when someone finds the vigilante group and starts following them. After a while, the film becomes more a drama about the vigilantes and their individual lives than the tale of revenge suggested. After a while, the movie starts feeling long; it is about 2 hours, and after about an hour in it does start feeling long. In the end, it becomes more of a melodrama than a crime film. Again, this was OK at most, so I am charitably giving it 2 out of 5 stars, mostly because some of the performances, especially Don Lee as the vigilante leader, were good, but the film as a whole was a bit of a drag for a not so satisfactory ending. Watched 6/12 on TubiTv.
  • Amityville in the Hood (2021. Horror.) Plot description: "An Eastside gang uses the Amityville property to grow marijuana when they are attacked by a rival gang and their drugs stolen. Soon, it's unleashed on the Westside streets of Compton, where anyone who smokes it suffers one KILLER buzz." Premise overall is pretty simple: two guys steal pot that was growing inside the sort of abandoned Amityville house (yea, that house), but then they get robbed by another gang, who then takes the pot from them to Compton, California. Who was growing the pot? Does not matter. The house is there just to get this plot going. Once people in Compton start smoking the stolen pot, things go from bad to worse as the smokers turn into monsters. Overall this is one of those seriously low budget films with a bunch of unknown actors barely acting. Sadly even that relatively simple plot they can't keep straight as the story goes from the weed to objects from the house that got auctioned, went to other places, and cause all sorts of evil. Kind of like a flashback. The result is a sort of ridiculous mess that we are not quite sure what is going on. The bad acting, well, not quite amusing, and pretty bad. The effects, when you get any, cheap. Overall, this is pretty awful even with a giggle or two here or there. It's a mess you probably should skip. 1 out of 5 stars. Via TubiTv. Watched 6/12. 
    • In cheap details, a few minutes in, someone in a mask is laying a curse and using a book that has what appears to be a photo of Anton LaVey on the back cover. I could not make out the title of the book. Anyhow, book is likely used as a quick prop of a grimoire or similar.  
    • As often case, a movie that puts all their credits at the beginning is a sign of a bad or cheesy film, and this one does it.  
    • In cheap details, in transition moments, they use a really cheap hip hop soundtrack with lyrics somewhat connected to the Amityville theme.
  • The Barn  (2018. Horror. Crime. Mystery). Plot description: "A journalist sent to cover a serial killer case causes friction in the town as she discovers an ominous barn owned by two troubled brothers." Film starts stating that after 9/11 there was an epidemic in the nation that cause, among other things, violence and necrosis. As film starts, it is 10 years later or so, and while the epidemic is considered contained, the virus is still active and out there. So the film is a bit more so far than just a serial killer story. It is sort of a zombie movie with a serial killer to complicate things. However, the issue is the story does not  really tie much together. The serial killer angle is relatively minimal. The zombies mostly is the one guy keeps some infected folks in a barn hoping to keep them under control; we've seen this device in places like The Walking Dead and  some other zombie stories of people having a soft side for zombies who are just gone by now. The reporter, aside from being nosy, also not that big a deal. Talking happens here or there. The farm people do chores now and then, and once in a while there is a victim of the serial killer, but no apparent urgency from the local cops, certainly not from the one deputy which is all the law enforcement we see in the movie. This is just a seriously slow drag that does not quite know what it is about. As for the acting, fairly quotidian, but then again, to do a lot of farm chores and some talking here or there does not take that much acting skill. One hour in, for an hour and half movie, and you are still wondering what the heck is this exactly about. Don't expect the ending to make things clearer. 1 out of 5 stars, and that barely. This is one you should skip, and I wish I had. Watched 6/20. Via TubiTv.
  • Tarot Curse (2025. Horror. Mystery). Plot description: "After a Tarot reading in New Orleans, a group of students are horrified to realize the cards are predicting their gruesome deaths one by one."  Before we go on, this is not the Tarot film released in theaters recently; this is one of the Tubi original films. The trailer made it seem pretty cheesy, so I figured why not take a chance? To start, the opening sequence and first death seemed a bit silly, but also fun, so we may be to a good start for this type of movie. Once movie starts, we get a bunch of high school seniors taking a last senior trip to New Orleans, for the most part the usual mostly disposable teens. The card reading scene in New Orleans I thought was pretty good; I'd get a reading from her. The character had that blend of elder witch with a bit of the stereotypes of a card reader. Scene is a bit silly and a bit spooky. The transition to the next scene was interesting, was it a dream or not? Anyhow, we get to them returning from the trip, and this is where things now will start happening. Naturally, we got the one teen, the Black guy in this case, who tries to warn others about the cards and what is happening. Naturally, no one wants to listen, even though the signs are there. To be honest, this was better than I thought it would be. A bit by the numbers: they got a card, and then their fate happens, which ends in death. Deaths were somewhat creative, a bit of gore but not too much. Film had a good pace, and while not great, it was entertaining. This could be a movie you might watch as part of a Halloween marathon. Yes, they take some liberties with the card interpretations, but it is a horror movie. Certainly a lot better than other movies I watched this month so far. Simple, entertaining, it works. 3 out of 5 stars. Watched 6/27. 
 


Television and other series (basic show information links via Wikipedia unless noted otherwise). Some of these come in DVD from the public library. Others may be via YouTube, which, as noted before, I keep finding all sorts of other old shows in it, often full episodes:

  •  Gordon Ramsay's 24 Hours to Hell and Back (2018-2020. Reality. Restaurants. Cooking). Plot description: The premise here is Ramsay will attempt to fix a restaurant and get it back on track in 24 hours. To do so, his team and him travel in a giant truck that serves as command center and mobile training kitchen. Before fixing the place, he visits it undercover, wearing a disguise, often with guests, to assess the place. If you liked shows like his Secret Service (see above) or maybe Kitchen Nightmares (I tend to prefer his original British show, but 24 Hours is closer in style to the American version of Kitchen Nightmares), you may like this one. I saw Tubi had it, read a bit about it, took a chance and started it at the end of last month, May 2026. It has three seasons, and I managed to finish the series this month.
  • Next Level Chef (2022- . Reality. Cooking Competition). Tubi just got in the recently finished 5th season. I commented on the 4th season here. So far I have liked this series, so started watching the 5th season this month. This season has 15 episodes. As before, first three episodes are auditions: one episode each for professional chefs, home chefs, and social media chefs. I zipped through it and finished it this month. I think I tend to  like this series because, so far, has a bit less drama and less asshole behavior from the contestants than shows like Hell's Kitchen where there is always at least one arrogant obnoxious asshole competing. I understand the show has been renewed, so I will be watching it sometime next year. 
  • Shipping Wars (2012-2022. Reality TV). Plot description: "The show follows various independent shippers who have discovered that money can be made transporting large/bulky/unusual items that traditional carriers either cannot or will not haul." I remember watching some of the episodes when the show was on the air. For me, what was interesting was the objects and items they hauled from museum pieces to just unusual things. Episodes last about 22 minutes without ads. Tubi has the first four seasons, out of nine in total, which is where I started watching this month.
    • Side note, I checked Roku Channel, and they got seasons 8 and 9 of the series.

 

 

Friday, July 03, 2026

Deck Review: Human Spirit Oracle

Jenna Dellagrottaglia and Laurence Toner, Human Spirit Oracle: Learning to Reconnect. NSW, Australia: Rockpool Publishing, 2023. ISBN: 9781922785176. 

Genre: oracle decks 
Subgenre: spirituality 
Format: Kit with small paperback book and deck.
Source: I own this one. 

 

This kit includes a paperback companion book and a 44-card deck. The deck's theme is "about what we all universally experience as humans, and reminds us that we are all connected" (from back of box description). The cards art drew me to this deck, and it has become a favorite. Jena Dellagrottaglia is listed as author and artist, so that drew me to the deck too. She has done artwork on some of Colette Baron-Reid's decks. However, inside the book, on the next to last page mentions Laurence Toner as author; it seems he wrote some or all of the text. This is not fully clear. 

The book is 104 pages long and is arranged as follows: 

  • Introduction. Describes the deck's concept. 
  • How to use the cards. Brief instruction on how you can use the cards. Instruction is open-ended. Note this deck can be read reversed. Upright and reversed meanings are provided. Section also includes instruction to do a one-card pull and two additional card spreads. 
  • The cards. Each entry includes a color card image, card number and title, upright and reverse meanings. Each entry is two pages long. 
  • About the creators. 
  • Acknowledgements. 

Book pages are in color, and it is a nice book with various small illustrations throughout. It is a very easy read. Card messages are mostly positive and uplifting, but they also look at darker moments in life. If you need messages to comfort you a bit and live within the human condition, this book and deck are a good option. There are some humorous cards and moments too. 

The card art blends collage with a surrealist style and feel. Art is colorful and expressive with good attention to detail. Cards can work well for intuitive readers. I find I can read them intuitively. I still read the book, and I'd read the entries after my initial reading reading of the cards. I usually rotate decks every month. I kept this one in rotation for two months. I'll probably take it to my work office to use in my small altar for a while.  

The cards measure about 5 inches by 3 1/2 inches. The card back is in green with a circular Celtic style circle. Card back is reversible. The cards have a bright green gilded edge, which is a nice touch. 

Overall I really like this deck, and it is now a favorite for me. For me it works well for my path with the Cosmic Joker. I love the art, and I find it easy to use. I do recommend it. 

5 out of 5 stars.  

Kit qualifies for the following 2026 Reading Challenge: