Friday, June 03, 2022

Book Review: The History of Tarot Art

Esther Joy Archer and Holly Adams Easley, The History of Tarot Art: Demystifying the Art and Arcana, Deck by Deck. Bellevue, WA: Epic Ink, 2021. ISBN: 9780760371244.
 
Genre: Tarot
Subgenre: art history
Format: e-book galley
Source: NetGalley
 

This book looks at the history of art in Tarot through 12 Tarot decks. The book takes us from the Middle Ages to modern times, featuring a good sampling of decks over time. Each deck gets a chapter in the book. The 12 featured decks are: 

 

  • Visconti.

  • Sola-Busca.

  • Tarot de Marseille.

  • Rider Waite Smith.

  • Thoth.

  • Aquarian.

  • Morgan-Greer.

  • Motherpeace.

  • Cosmic.

  • Druidcraft.

  • Deviant Moon.

  • The Wild Unknown.

  • Contemporary Tarot. This chapter is an overview of some additional contemporary decks. This chapter means to look more at some recent trends.

The book is interesting and informative. We get for the most part a good history of each deck including what makes it distinctive and what is the deck's legacy. A bonus is that at the end of each chapter you get "other decks you may like" that may be similar to the featured deck. Additionally, the book is well illustrated with photos and images from decks and other relevant art pieces. As I said, for the most part the book is interesting and informative. It provides some substance in looking at the cards and the deck creators. 

I said informative for the most part because the authors have a tendency to insert their snarky commentary and at times very strong opinions on their pet topics. If they like a deck, they gush all over it. If they hate it, like the Thoth Tarot, they spend a lot of a chapter bitching about the deck and its creator. In this example, they really hate Aleister Crowley, and they want to make sure everyone knows it. The authors are podcasters, so the book suffers a bit from what books based on podcasts, blogs, TikTok, etc. tend to suffer: too much informality. That informality detracts from what can be a solid and mostly very good overview of the topic. 

Despite the authors most of the book is a good read. A good point they make is about Lady Frida Harris. Just like Pamela Colman Smith is getting more recognition now, Harris is another artist that deserves her day in the sun. 

 In addition, the book does feature a small appendix on how to read Tarot for folks who may feel inspired to give it a go. It also has a small resources list with a few books and websites if you readers want to learn more. 

Overall, I liked the, but I would've liked it better without the snark. The facts can speak for themselves. Still, the authors are passionate about the topic, and as they state in the book, they look at these decks "based on historical fact and documentation, not 'fakelore'" (9). In that regard, they do put in a good honest effort. 
 
This is still a good selection for public libraries. You can select it as an art book or as a Tarot book. For academic libraries, it may be a good option if you have a strong art and art history collection. Otherwise, it would be an optional selection. For my library, I would get it if a patron requested it. In the end, I am glad I read it as I learned some new things. For many readers, this may be a book to borrow. 
 
3 out of 5 stars. 
 
* * * * * 
 
Additional reading notes: 
 
How Tarot grew: 
 
"Tarot grew out of the universal human desire to demystify the future. It started as a card game played mostly by medieval upper classes, but eventually turned into a divinatory process accessible to laypeople without formal training" (7).


Why we have the "your first deck has to be gifted" nonsense: 

"There was a backlash as tarot came to be associated with witchcraft. Powerful religious communities forced tarot to go underground for most of the nineteenth century, and it was taught and shared only in secret. That's why there's an old wives' tale in tarot communities that you need to be gifted your first deck, because stepping into tarot required a trust between teacher and student" (9).


 
 
* * * * *
 
This book qualifies for the following 2022 Reading Challenge: 
 

 


No comments: